Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 09:03 PM UTC

In Praise of Looting

Anarchist OpinionThe devastation wrought on the Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina is clearly evident three days after the winds started blowing and the journalists scampered out from their hotels. Most of New Orleans is under water. The Mississippi and Alabama coasts are obliterated. The situation in New Orleans is dire as thousands of people struggle to survive and get out of the worsening toxic cesspool that the city is becoming.

In Praise of Looting

Blaming Katrina's victims for not being rich

By Harry Looter
For Infoshop News
September 1, 2005

“The Iberville Housing Projects got pissed off because the police started to "shop" after they kicked out looters. Then they started shooting at cops. When the cops left, the looters looted everything. There's probably not a grocery left in this city.”
http://www.livejournal.com/users/interdictor/

The devastation wrought on the Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina is clearly evident three days after the winds started blowing and the journalists scampered out from their hotels. Most of New Orleans is under water. The Mississippi and Alabama coasts are obliterated. The situation in New Orleans is dire as thousands of people struggle to survive and get out of the worsening toxic cesspool that the city is becoming.

In the midst of all of this pain and misery, the media and the authorities have decided that the central story now is the looting and “lawlessness” that are taking place around the city. The poor, mostly black, victims of Hurricane Katrina are being blamed for their response to the situation. Their logical response to having the homes and neighborhoods destroyed is understandable given that this disaster has been happening for a long time in their neighborhoods and lives. The ongoing disaster that they are reacting to is the catastrophe known as capitalism.

The media knows that playing up the looting on TV plays well in Peoria. Comfortable middle class white people watch the New Orleans situation on TV and resort to simplistic Christian judgments about right and wrong. Some of them understand that the “looters” have a moral right to take food and medicine, but they seize on news that looters have taken guns and TVs as evidence that the looters are bad people. The authorities help reinforce these beliefs with their constant pontification about how looters will be punished. This morning the authorities are further demonizing the poor people of New Orleans by suspending rescue efforts because some person fired at a Coast Guard rescue worker. We all know that if some white dude in a rich neighborhood that was under water fired at rescue workers the rescue effort would continue uninterrupted.

What exactly is so evil about taking a package of Pampers or some cans of food from a Winn-Dixie or a Wal-Mart store? These people are trying to survive in neighborhoods that are under water, with no services of any kind. Are the rescue workers, the media, or the state dropping pampers and bottled water into the flooded neighborhoods of New Orleans? Are the on-the-scene Fox News anchors putting down their microphones, rolling up their sleeves, and helping rescue people?

The media and authorities’ obsession with looting is racist, capitalist and simply inhumane. What difference does it make what people take from the stores near their neighborhoods? They have no access to food, clean water, diapers, medicine, shoes, liquor, cigarettes and all the things that they need to get through this crisis. It’s not like these corporate grocery stores are going to go bankrupt because hungry people clear out an inventory that will have to be destroyed once the waters recede. People are “dumpster-diving” from stores who are insured, well capitalized, and which will have to throw away all of their stock anyway.

The Government Can’t Help You

The failure of the American state to respond to this tragedy is abundantly clear at this point. In its typical fashion, the state will turn the situation into a circus before the capitalist profiteers move in. On Friday, American president George W. Bush will fly into New Orleans to perform a photo op while some residents of New Orleans are still trapped in their attics. Many poor residents will be dying as Bush speaks useless words about the catastrophe. The hungry and wet people won’t be fed by Bush’s visit, but perhaps if he falls out of a helicopter while surveying the damage, the residents can make a good jambalaya with the presidential corpse. Meanwhile, there are reports that Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice was laughing it up last night at a production in New York City of 'Spamalot'.

The catastrophe in New Orleans once again demonstrates the inability of the state to take care of its subjects, especially its poorest citizens. For all of the talk about “homeland security” over the past few years, very little homeland security was available for the residents of New Orleans. There are reports now about how the government cut back on programs that would have helped New Orleans weather this disaster. The immediate response by rescue workers was hampered by the fact that the Louisiana National Guard is stuck in Iraq, fighting and losing an imperialist war staged by Bush and his Halliburton cronies. The evacuation plan worked for middle and upper class people with cars, but apparently there was no effort to bus poor people out of the city as Hurricane Katrina approached.

If there is a silver lining in this ongoing tragedy, it involves the small acts of mutual aid being done by New Orleans residents for each other. This includes people rescuing people from flooded houses, people helping move sick people to dry ground, people sharing food and materials with each other, and much more. In times of natural or manmade disasters, humans have shown time and time again their ability to help each other out via mutual aid. These responses play out organically and can’t be organized by the state. In many instances, the state’s efforts interfere with this mutual aid and make situations worse. It’s pretty clear in New Orleans that the state totally failed the poor residents of the city.

Looting is not a problem in New Orleans right now. People have a right to take what they need to survive. Even if they take things that aren’t needed for survival, those of us watching from the comfort of our dry homes have no reason to complain about these actions. Finally, let’s remember that looting is a form of wealth redistribution. When rich people loot, they call it capitalism, good business practices, third quarter dividends, the new economy and “giving people job.” When your neighborhood is under water and there are no relief services in sight, taking diapers from a Wal-Mart is not a criminal or immoral act.

Hooray for the looters!

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20050901091050714

No trackback comments for this entry.
In Praise of Looting | 35 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 09:38 AM UTC
Right on!

Looting should be going on *everyday* not just during emergencies!
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 07:22 PM UTC
I agree, you point couldn't be more well pointed. Get what you can now, where ever you are. We all could use some new stuff.
Anarchists in New Orleans
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 11:35 AM UTC
I wonder if the entire New Orleans anarchist community evacuated or if anyone is still active there?

This is another situation, like the Cincinnati riots, where a month down the road people will start scratching their heads, realizing it was a potentially revolutionary situation, and writing articles about how anarchists should have participated, helping people out, organizing decentralized mutual aid, and organizing defensive networks against the police.

It must be horrible conditions there, but that's what a lot of the revolution is going to be like. Radicals in that area could be creating anarchy on the ground. The rest of us around the country need to do what we can to support the situation, illustrate the conflict between rioters feeding themselves and cops shooting them, and generalize this riot, so it doesn't take massive catastrophe for people to start procuring their own needs in opposition to the government. Anarchy starts now!
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 11:40 AM UTC
Whoever posted that last comment is right on. I'm not adding anything else because thier post says it all!

cyfer
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 01:34 AM UTC
Dude,

Whether they are Cheap or expensivie items, the working class, the
exploited class, the epsilons, the poor, the wet and hungy made them!!!
Working class people don't just deserve food and shelter, they deserve
all the things that the working people create, INCLUDING TVS, FINE
LIQOUR, AND WONDERFULL DRY AND WARM HOMES. Poor people build
rich houses and poor alike. It IS very revolutionary to TAKE from the
rich, alphas, upper class, rulers, and despots, and have it for your own!!
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 12:23 PM UTC
"that looters have taken guns and TVs as evidence that the looters are bad people."

What's so revolutionary about getting shit you don't need for free (jewerly, TV's, etc.) instead of having to pay for it? So, when middle class people consume shit, it's spiritually deadening, alienating, destroys the planet, exploits workers, and so on. When poor people do it, it's somehow revolutionary?

I was under the impression that one of the main things anarchism preaches is that we should all stop working jobs we hate to buy shit we don't need. Looting non-essential items is the same consumerist mentality - what's so great about that?

c
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 06:08 AM UTC
perfectly said.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 06:51 AM UTC
If you lost your house and everything you owned you might be able to sell a few electronics to help get yourself some food and a place to stay once you find dry land...if you find dry land at all.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13 2005 @ 01:04 PM UTC
and that is aslo a few more dollars that dont go into a ceo's bank acount
a word of clarification
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 07:14 PM UTC
You're confusing dropping out of the middle class ("...stop working jobs we hate to buy shit we don't need...") with proletarian revolution. Among some sectors of the working class, a shitty job (or looting) may be the only thing that stands between one and doing without things that *are* needed. Like food and medicine for the kids. Historically, lots of revolutionaires have worked jobs. And, usually, tried to organize their co-workers.

You can pick for yourself which one, dropping out, or figting back in solidarity with others, is "anarchy".

pc, the Capital Terminus Collective, (persoanal capacity)
p_c(no-spam)riseup.net
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 09 2005 @ 01:47 PM UTC
you need goods and everything is closed so.....
you can not get money....and only water,
only one question: Why the looters get only one color?
Like only them can do that... its suspicious to me...
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 01:26 PM UTC
The Situationist International in 1965 re the Watts riots:

Looting is a <i>natural</I> response to the unnatural and inhuman society of commodity abundance. It instantly undermines the commodity as such, and it also exposes what the commodity ultimately implies: the army, the police and the other specialized detachments of the state
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 02:27 PM UTC
This is from the anarchist bookstore/library in New Orleans:

"Hello, everyone.

Email seems to be the best form of communication these days, as most
504 phones and cell phones are down. I think it's a safe bet to say that
the Iron Rail will be closed for the remainder of the summer.

Many of our collective members happened to be out of town during the
hurricane and I'm pretty positive that everyone else left town. I heard
on Monday morning that the Iron Rail and Plan B were not flooded, but
that was Monday, prior to much of the flooding. Any updates on the
space would be appreciated.

Regardless, we are going to need lots of support from the whole US
radical community when we re-open. Hope you and yours are safe. Updates
from Iron Rail collective members and supporters would be great - write
to nolabookcollective@hotmail.com Love and books,
~ Kate from the Iron Rail."
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 02:37 PM UTC
I think the entire New Orelans anarchist community evactuated, unfortunately. i knowif i was there i'd be gettin together with the other folks who are there and fightin off the pigs and the national guard and helping people loot.

y'all gotta understand new orleans is a wild place. it's the murder capital of the country. sometimes 5 or 6 people will get killed in a day there, especially during the hot summer when tempers are short.
just because all these news reporter assholes from around the country didn't notice how crazy it was before the hurricane, they think it's so wild.

and by the way, the wal-mart that was looted, was built on a former low-income neighborhood and made some developers millionaries, and destroyed a community. we fought against it for years. including putting up tons of posters that said "steal what you need and burn the rest" with a picture of a burning wal-mart. maybe people took the suggestions?!
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 03:13 PM UTC
this the one in the Irish Channel back behind where the Projects used to be? I used to live on St. Mary's where is dead-ended there. God i miss new orleans and shit i have been crying for days now. much love and support to everyone there.

and oh yeah go take what you need!
In Praise of Cuba
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 08:42 PM UTC
Harry Looter writes:
The catastrophe in New Orleans once again demonstrates the inability of the state to take care of its subjects, especially its poorest citizens.

...

In times of natural or manmade disasters, humans have shown time and time again their ability to help each other out via mutual aid. These responses play out organically and can

In Praise of Cuba
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 12:44 AM UTC
The catastrophe in NOLA pouints out the inablitiy of people to form communities based on mutual aid, i.e, the basic component of anarchism.

While peopel can and do take food and clothing, others are just looting consumer goods in a materialisti, consumerist fashion. It's no big deal. I could care less if pepel help themselves from Wal-Mart's shelves.

The problem is that people are mimicing the capitalist society where the strong take from the weak. Armed gangs are takiing food and water from the weak.

Furthermore, while the police let a lot of the looting to slide. It has now gotten to such an epidemic proprotion that they are abandoning their search and rescue duties to enforce the law. This does no one any good when thousands are in depserate need.

The looters act like capitalists. They only seek their individual desires while the whole community suffers.

The looters (those who are stocking up on non-essential goods) are not helping their communtiy. There are those who are giving aid to their fellow human beings, but the looters are only seeking what they can get for themselves.

For anarchists to think that this is some sort of pre-revolutionary opportunity is ludicrous. The people need the basics and they need to be rescued.

How many anarchists do you know that own and can fly a helicopter to do rooftop rescues? How many anarchists have medical training, or training in emergency relief?Not too many.

There are plenty of anarchists who can postulate about the rightousness of looting, but few who have any useful skills or knowledge thay can help anyone in NOLA right now.

There have been rapes, looting of hospitals, and attacks against rescue workers. Does this sound like anarchism? It sounds more like survival-of-the-fittest chaos. Anarchism is about mutual aid and organization to benefit the greater good. This is not about looting. To praise wanton looting outside of necessity is to praise capitalist consumerism.

Besides, it is just wishful thinking that a natural disaster on
the scale of Katrina can be turned into some self-stlyed anarchist propaganda victory.

Get over your rhetorical selves, i.e., cut the crap. What is happening in NOLA is just a damned tragedy. If you want to take something anarchist from this event, just use it as evidence of the governement's complete failue to do anyhting useful in the vent of a crisis.
In Praise of Cuba
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 09:52 AM UTC
Actually there have been reports of looters actually helping those effected.
In Praise of Cuba
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 06:52 PM UTC
They are not acting like capitalists. They are challening one of the very foundation of the capitalist system.

Any anti-capitalist worthy of the name should support that.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 01 2005 @ 09:56 PM UTC
sadly enough i tried talking to my dad about this and he is just being a jerk. saying oh but people are looting, and i said yeah they arent gonna make a profit off the stuff now anyways and these people need some of the stuff , then he made a rude comment and even pulled up fox news when i just walked away and refused to talk to him about it any further.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: black helicopter on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 05:49 PM UTC
I agree that this situation presents tremendous opportunities for the poor of New Orleans. Since all the capitalists left town before the hurricane, there's nothing but a few cops and National Guardsmen to prevent the people who had to stay from taking over the city, taking over the means of production, and squating on private property. See if Washington will still ignore New Orleans then.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 06:43 PM UTC
Regardless of what real or imagined injustices there are in this society, there is absolutely no excuse for what is going on in New Orleans. There is no justified reason for anyone to take anything more than they need for their survival, and I find it hilarious that anti-capitalists would embrace a greedy free-for all as people strip shelves of luxury items, big screen tvs, stereos and pornography.

The wait here is 3 days, not 3 months. God forbid this report of cannibalism is true. Years ago when I was very poor, I actually lived on saltine crackers for 3 days and waited calmly like an adult until my check came in. It never occured to me to act like a street thug or a group of children in dad's liquor cabinet while the parents were away for the weekend.

Unfortunately, it seems that progressives make excuses for people (especially swarthy ones) instead of taking a look at how they are complicating their own situtation by their irresponsible and counterproductive behavior. Apparently an analysis of one's own behavior is only applicable to those of us of ivory origins.

Now we have reports of racially-motivated attacks against European and Australian students. Where is the anti-racist crowd?

My own family survived times of crisis in the middle of WWII, they often had no food for sometimes several days at a time and eventually my mother lost her teeth to malnutrition. They did not act like animals during this trying time, and this went on from 1944 until the early 1950s, let alone THREE LOUSY DAYS.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 08:27 PM UTC
People seem to be critizing looters for taking non essential items, "consumerist" and "materialistic" items.

These people are bombarded with ads telling them that they want these things, and at the same time can only dream of affording them. If the opportunity arises to get them, why shouldnt they take it? how can you criticize them for not abiding by your high handed anti-consumerist mentality?

Taking a TV is not a threat to capitalism because you get a free TV, it is a threat because it shatters the mystical veil of the commodity, it proves that things can be directly appropriated without exchanging labor time.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Admin on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 08:53 PM UTC
The preoccupation with people in New Orleans is racist, pure and simple. These people have just had their neighborhoods and lives destroyed. Who are we who are living comfortably right now to criticize their actions?

A few important things to keep in mind:

1) Most of the looting is of essential items like food, water, medicine and other materials.
2) Many of the "luxury" items taken are being sold by people to get money so that they can get out of town or have some cash for the future.
3) Most of these businesses are insured.
4) Almost all of the inventory in these stores would have been thrown out anyway because of the water damage. If anything, the "looters" are actually dumpster-diving.
5) Some of these stores were opposed by residents, such as Wal-Mart. They have a right to take stuff from Wal-Mart and other capitalist stores that exploit them.

Chuck0
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Admin on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 10:04 PM UTC
Right wing, reactionary bullshit deleted.

Admin
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: black helicopter on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 10:14 PM UTC
shit.. i typed up a response to the reactionary comment, so i might as well post it anyway.

Remember, these people that you're criticizing for acting like savages have just had everything they own (which given their position in society, was not much) destroyed; they're dealing with a lack of medical supplies, a lack of food, a lack of water, extreme heat, etc. Anyway, why is an anarchist defending the property rights?

About the rape, violence, etc. I don't think anyone is actually in favor of this. At the same time, it's absolutely insane to use two or three murders as a justification for martial law and a "shoot to kill" policy. Remember, there are tens of thousands of people in the city right now, living in extremely poor conditions. The fact that there have only been a handful of murders is actually pretty amazing.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 02 2005 @ 11:46 PM UTC
i think that to say that because someone criticizes some of the horrific things
that have been happening is a racist, is to be moralistically dogmatic, and i
would say attempting to shame a person into not expressing their opinion.

i agree that people taking what is needed for their survival is not a bad thing.
but for those few people who have been robbing others to horde supplies,
shooting at people attempting to leave a hospital, shooting at people rescue
workers, looting the children's hospital, murdering and raping people, they
all make a bad situation worse. and the situation should not be glossed over.
these people are no better than the government lackies, the police, or the
capitalists, they are looking out for themselves and themselves alone.

the vast majority of the people in new orleans are good honest people that
are trying to make it through a horrible situation. and this is a prime example
of how the state, federal and local authorities have dropped the ball, and
how very far away from the anarchistic society we want to build, we are.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 03 2005 @ 09:06 AM UTC
First of all, most of those things have been baseless rumours.

Secondly, why is it "bad" to take stuff you "dont need" out of stores? I honestly dont get it, its all from stores/corporations anyway, so why do you even care?
Damned right, there's no excuse!
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 04 2005 @ 03:45 AM UTC
Definitely, "there is absolutely no excuse for what is going on in New Orleans." There's no excuse for people being denied food and, especially, potable water for days. There's even less excuse for people trying to distract attention from this major crime by wagging their tongues over redistribution of capitalist property by unconventional means.

One anonymous schmuck writes, "Years ago when I was very poor, I actually lived on saltine crackers for 3 days and waited calmly like an adult until my check came in." If this character had a reasonably safe opportunity to appropriate real food and didn't take it, he's just the kind of damned fool the ruling-class thieves love. Same goes for his mother -- if she could have taken food (or money for food) from those who had more than enough, and failed to do so. (Maybe her malnutrition was responsible for the apparent mental deficiency in her anonymous offspring!)

Anonymnous schmuck also writes, "people (especially swarthy ones) ... are complicating their own situtation by their irresponsible and counterproductive behavior". Is this fool saying that some "swarthy" people are "complicating their own situtation" by etc., or that the behavior of some "swarthy" people is complicating the situation of other "swarthy" people? I think the latter is implied, and if so it is clearly racist to say thay "are complicating their own situtation"!

BTW, when anonymous asshole lived for three days on saltines, he presumably had potable water and a safe, dry place to sleep. So his martyrdom on behalf of property rights isn't all that impressive.

- Aaron A.
In Praise of Living
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 04 2005 @ 09:20 AM UTC
As you sit at your computer, in your warm, dry house; TV blaring on the other side of the room; gold wedding band around your finger; beer (or wine?) in the fridge; in addition to all the essentials such as drinkable water, food, clothing, sanitation, etc. readily available to you, you think you have a right to criticize people for wanting the same things?

Also, I totally agree with the poster who essentially said you're a complete moron if you went three days eating crackers and did nothing about it (I'm paraphrasing, of course). Have you been so brainwashed that your survival instincts no longer exist whatsoever?
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: A on Saturday, September 03 2005 @ 09:49 AM UTC
I do not want to attack looters but I would not glorify it either. I think looting is an uneffective and unjust way to distribute necessary goods such as food and water in condition of a crisis. Many people are unable to loot, such as elderly, sick and disabled. In a crisis situation food and water should be rationed. I think Kropotkin wrote about this in conquest of bread. Revolutionaries should organise committees in order to expropriate remaining goods in stores, ration them and to justly distribute them along people.


In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 04 2005 @ 12:37 AM UTC
Send in the literature tables!

Let them eat pamphlets!
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 09 2005 @ 05:40 PM UTC

Just because some people can't do it (whether that be looting, or quitting jobs, or whatever) doesn't mean it's never a legitimately effective tactic. (Seriously--have you read Kurt Vonnegut's short story about the dystopian world in which people are only allowed to do what "everyone" can do?) Those who can steal, should; those who can loot, should; those who can quit their jobs and drop out, should--all these with an eye to seizing every resource possible for the sake of sharing with all.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 12 2005 @ 01:11 AM UTC
I tried to comment on this before but kept getting blocked.

I forget much of what I typed out, but quite a bit of it dealt with the idiot who ate saltines for 3 days and made themselves a medal over it-congrats, you're a fool. I am at a computer in a house, I have a place to go to sleep in a moment, I will be able to shower in the morning (though I'm an anarchist so I certainly never shower), I'll be able to put on clean (sorta) dry clothing, I will be able to purchase food from a nearby store, I will be able to turn on the faucet and drink the water that comes out of it (against my best judgement). I will be able to live another day, and quite comfortably I may add. Therefore, I have no right to say SHIT about anyone in New Orleans who is dealing with this storm and the lack of empathy from the upper echelon of society-in terms of economics anyway. I do not care if someone takes food and water or designer clothes and TV's. Where does this purist bullshit come from anyway? Anyone on here who purports to be a purist needs to seriously consider suicide because honestly you're doing damage just by living right now. This isn't a situation that needs to be examined by the all theory no action group. This doesn't need a op-ed piece on how you feel anarchy was or wasn't present in New Orleans. We don't need your morally superior opinion on people that you know nothing about.

Choke on those saltines next time.
In Praise of Looting
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 12 2005 @ 02:21 PM UTC
Anarchism's morality is boring.

"Revolutionaries are pious folk, the rev is not."

I have no illusions of any positivist out-come. katrina is an example of the future we have to look forward to. Perhaps yall are'nt into the collapse of social order after all? There is no need to surgarcoat this event, it is a disaster, perhaps state ellaborated. The looting is of course, reasonable. Anarchists response has been diverse and interesting, some 'praising' the looting, others doing some ground work to re-create social order and some doing 'humanitarian' deeds. But we are not the state--nor contrary to popualr belief, are we trying to disarticulate it. Our task is not nice, nor pretty. And in instances like this, and those to follow, we should infact ellaborate on the crisis, and find beauty and meaning in 'dis-order' (as they say) But how?