Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 08:07 PM UTC

Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005

ImperialismRecent photos from the war in Iraq. Due to the outage of infoshop.org, the most recent collection of Iraq photos is split in two parts.

Part 1: Murder in the Desert

Photos From Iraq: May 26 – June 12, 2005


A mother outside Baghdad’s al-Yarmouk hospital, where her three sons were brought after they were shot by American soldiers on May 26th. According to an Iraqi police official, U.S. soldiers fired on a bus in southeast Baghdad, killing three people and wounding four others. Two of the dead were children of the woman in the picture.


Husam Abdul-Zahra, who is 17, is the brother that survived.


Mohammed Hamid was injured during fighting between collaborators and anti-occupation militants in Fallujah, where the resistance has begun to re-establish iteself, on the same day.


Ahmad Sharif lost his eyes and his right arm when a bomb exploded near his home last year in Sadr City. On May 27, he was fitted with prosthetic eyes in New York. AFP didn’t say whose bomb hit him.


Collaborators on Sadoun street in Baghdad, as part of a much hyped lockdown of the capital


Squatter kids in Basra in front of their home, a building once used by Iraqi police. May 29.


Iraqi police remove the remains of a suicide bomber after he attacked a convoy of U.S. soldiers and collaborators near the oil ministry in Baghdad on May 29.


June 5, in Baghdad.


On June 8, another mysterious oil pipeline fire near Baiji.


Also on June 8, Iraqis living in the “green zone” in Baghdad staged a protest against their eviction. After the invasion, landlords jacked up rent prices throughout Iraq, driving many people to occupy former government buildings. A similar protest occurred on the same day in Basra, where some of the squatters were arrested; the girl’s sign says, “Why now?”


In the desert near al-Qaim, two vanloads of collaborators on leave were kidnapped and executed. This picture is from June 11.


In Baghdad the same day.


On the same day, Ehab Adel was in the hospital in al-Qaim after he was shot in the head by an American snipter.


So was Ahmed Abdullah – also shot by a sniper.


And so was Mohammed Latif. All were shot from the local customs offices, which had been occupied by Americans.


Also that day, the Americans carried out one of their “precision strikes” on the village of Karabilah, supposedly against muj checkpoints – but as usual, photographers who checked found destroyed houses and wounded civilians.


Such as Qusah Daham.


In Basra that day, several hundred women held a protest to demand that their family members, arrested by the occupiers, be released.


In Baghdad, when you don’t stop for a checkpoint.


Carrie French, KIA.

The Americans bombed al-Qaim again on June 13, killing at least three people and wounding 13, including this man.



Stories: The U.S. military admits a sharp rise in the number of American deaths caused by roadside bombs, as resistance fighters have been learning to build ‘shaped charges’ which are designed to penetrate armor. IEDs account for 51% of the 255 combat deaths as of early June this year.

In Fallujah, a group of 16 American mercenaries were arrested by the U.S. military and held for three days after they apparently attacked American soldiers on two occasions. Driving in their armored SUV’s, the mercenaries at first appeared to be firing randomly, shooting at soldiers and Iraqi civilians. Later however, they drove up to a Marine observation post and again opened fire. Eventually spike strips stopped their trucks. In another amusing twist, the mercs alleged mild torture while in U.S. custody.

About those mercenaries: They’re killing a dozen Iraqi civilians a week in Baghdad. Another article mentions that Robert Young Pelton, author of ‘The World’s Most Dangerous Places’ and a critic, in his own way, of American wars, has spent a year in Iraq with mercenaries and is writing a book on the subject.

Two officiers fragged in Tikrit.



Photos from Iraq Archives:

May 12-25

May 4 – 11

April 26 – May 3

April 13 - 24

March 28—April 10

March 21--27

March 12--20

March 1–11

February 21--28

February 11--20

February 3--10

January 25 – Feb 1

January 15--24

January 3--14

November 23--Dec 6 (2004)

November 16 – 24

November 13–18
September 25--Nov 10

September 1-21

(some photos may be broken due to external sites moving images around)

selected sources:
Yahoo Iraq photos
Getty Images (type ‘Iraq’ and re-search)
Crisis pictures
TheNausea.com
Dahr Jamail
Cryptome
Please reply here or email dirtykaw at yahoo.com if you know where more original Iraq photos, preferably with details, can be obtained.

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20050625120528808

No trackback comments for this entry.
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005 | 6 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 06:34 AM UTC
Captioning some of the pictures as having 'collaborators' is kind of taking sides with the insurgents isn't it? I mean in ideological reality anarchists don't have much in common with either side be they American imperialist forces of islamic fundamentalist fighters.

I know people will argue that not all insurgent figters are islamic fundamentalists fighters, but it has to be admitted that a large portion are, as well as a large chunk being secular shite fighters. Who wants to be sympathetically aligned to them?

It's a nit picking point I suppose. Thanks for posting the pics.
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 26 2005 @ 02:52 PM UTC
thats bullshit. resistance to oppression is always justified.

Maybe you think we shouldn't call Sharon a genocidal monster because that's taking sides with the palestinian people (a large number of whom, after all, are muslim 'fundamentalists').

Maybe it was OK for the USSR to kill the catholic 'fundamentalists' involved in solidarnosc, or the USA to kill the catholic 'fundamentalists' trying to resist imperialism in central america?

Maybe it was justified to kill malcolm x, the infamous muslim 'fundamentalist'?
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 01:37 AM UTC
I figured that would probably come up eventually.

My opinion is this: Look at what the U.S. has done, and is doing, to Iraq. (Look at the pics from Fallujah in Sept 04.)

If you are working with/for a foreign occupier, especially one who is as horrible as the U.S. in Iraq, you are a collaborator by any definition. As just one example, a few months back I had a picture of some Iraqis who escaped from a U.S. military jail. (Keep in mind that most prisoners have no connection to the resistance.) The Iraqi police picked them up and returned them to the Americans. What else can you call that?

Now, most of these people are just in it for some cash (much like the American soldiers, except that the Iraqis need money for food, not a new car and a stereo) and I'm not agreeing that they should all be killed.

At the same time, it must be hard to hit the occupier when he's standing behind four rows of human shields.


I do suggest everyone research the new Iraqi cops - they are much like cops here in America, except that they have bigger guns, they are allowed to torture suspects, and they have a geniune and very justified fear for their lives. The point is, they have a very bad track record even aside from being American stooges.

I don't cheer when these 'collaborators' die - making Iraqis fight each other is the very core of America's strategy.

The term is definitely up for debate - but I'd like to point out one more time that the only thing we can/should do is to do everything we can to make the U.S. leave Iraq under unfavorable conditions. The Iraqis will have to sort out their own problems.

-combat
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 01:54 AM UTC
mmm one other thing.

It does occur to me that its very easy to sit here in America and call people 'collaborators'. By the same token, its easy to call people 'terrorists'.

I'm sure there are Iraqis who would argue either point, but from our point of view there can be only true name for the people of Iraq: Victims.
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 09:29 AM UTC
True. Alot of Iraqies(not nessasaraly a majority) are not exactly against the US presence(don't like them but don't like the other side either).

I think anti-imperialism has this big problem of black&white which just don't jive with everyday life for people in these situations. I expect alot of the black and white stuff from the more dogmatic antiimperial marxists as opposed to anarchists.

Be flexible in judgement and say fuck them both.

Vigilante
Photographs From Iraq: May 27 - June 12, 2005
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 27 2005 @ 07:28 PM UTC
'say fuck them both'

no. fuck you. occupiers always get collaborators - the germans in france, the americans in vietnam, the israelis in palestine.

While they might not all deserve to die, there are those who do - although in a secondary manner. syngman rhee, simply because he had a korean name, had nothing in common with the peasants whose death he enabled, and calling them all 'victims' is a farce.