Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 07:33 PM UTC

Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice

Anarchists in Trouble

The following op-ed represents a mainstream opinion that represents views which misrepresent and offend anarchists. Josh Wolf did not "hang around self-proclaimed anarchists"--he is in fact an anarchist involved with the independent media movement. The "self-proclaimed anarchists" were in fact anarchists involved with a group called Anarchist Action, which had organized the protest in question. There were no "punks", or a subculture, involved in these protests. Anarchists have organized protests around the world against the G8.

A college kid with a video camera and anarchist sympathies makes an unlikely First Amendment icon, but last week Josh Wolf became one.

Wolf, a 24-year-old from San Francisco, became the journalist to serve the longest stretch in prison for contempt of court for refusing to share unpublished materials with a grand jury. Wolf has spent nearly six months in the federal lockup in Dublin, and he isn't likely to breathe free air anytime soon.

A college kid with a video camera and anarchist sympathies makes an unlikely First Amendment icon, but last week Josh Wolf became one.

Wolf, a 24-year-old from San Francisco, became the journalist to serve the longest stretch in prison for contempt of court for refusing to share unpublished materials with a grand jury. Wolf has spent nearly six months in the federal lockup in Dublin, and he isn't likely to breathe free air anytime soon.

His standoff with federal prosecutors stems from a 2005 protest-turned-riot in San Francisco, where "anarchists" demonstrated on the occasion of a G-8 summit of major nations in Scotland. Violence broke out, a police car was nearly set ablaze, and a San Francisco police officer suffered a skull fracture in a melee.

Wolf, a journalism student and freelance videographer at the time, recorded the demonstration and sold footage to the local TV news. In effect, he was doing what reporters from CNN or Redding's Channel 7 do every day. For his trouble, he got a visit from federal investigators, who wanted to see the rest of his tapes of the demonstration. He refused to comply with a grand jury subpoena, and now he sits in jail.

California and almost every other state have shield laws that prevent journalists from being forced to name confidential sources or share notes. This legal privilege -- akin to lawyer-client or doctor-patient confidentiality -- simply assures that reporters can do their job.

Unfortunately, Congress has never enacted a similar federal shield law, and federal prosecutors in recent years have grown much more aggressive in forcing journalists to become investigative arms of the government.

This is deeply counterproductive.

Wolf hung around self-proclaimed anarchist activists, documenting their activities -- which blend political dissent and criminality into an occasionally nasty brew. If his subjects knew the government could seize his tapes, they would never agree to be filmed in the first place. Would keeping the public (and, for that matter, police and prosecutors) in the dark about this subculture serve anyone's interest? No.

It's time for Congress to pass a federal shield law, and it's time to release Josh Wolf. The anarchist punks whose mayhem he caught on film deserve due punishment, but throwing a journalist in jail to make him talk is the wrong way to accomplish that.

http://www.redding.com/news/2007/feb/13/jailing-reporter-is-no-way-to-bring-rioters-to/

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20070213151104790

No trackback comments for this entry.
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 13 2007 @ 06:23 PM UTC
"The anarchist punks whose mayhem he caught on film deserve due punishment"

Yea, fuck you.
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 13 2007 @ 06:38 PM UTC

"a San Francisco police officer suffered a skull fracture in a melee."

today's pig is tomorrow's bacon.
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 13 2007 @ 07:54 PM UTC
but what do you expect, that is why we have to keep writing our history books, our newspapers, our love stories...
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 08:17 AM UTC
"love stories?" Are you serious?
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 13 2007 @ 10:10 PM UTC
I wonder if the person who wrote this article would have written the same thing, let alone sought out to write this, if he knew that josh wolf was an anarchist and not just 'a normal person' (note my sarcasm)
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 12:09 AM UTC
Funny how whenever anarchists are mentioned, they're always "self-proclaimed", always have scare quotes. Satanists get the same deal.
Mainstream media: Jailing reporter is no way to bring rioters to justice
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 09:35 AM UTC
that's because, no one really takes anarchists seriously. collectivization is usually not associated with anarchist ideals, in the mainstream. individualism, esp. rugged individualism is usually associated. a world without laws were everyone is under the rules of survival of the fittest, not mutual aid. for many, mutual aid implies structure and a sense of governance. also, the other argument is: under an anarcho-capitalist society, both anarcho-capitalist and non-capitalist societies could exist. under the more collectivized model, capital couldn't exist. so since, there is (from their perspective) inherent regulation over the existence of capital. so, for them it isn't really anarchist at but "anarchist."

usually, events against the G8 is usually given as proof, that most of the people who consider themselves anarchists are anarchist at all, because they wouldn't to limit any person (that is business), from doing what it is they want to do.

it's a flawed argument, but that goes with the lack of debate between the two sides and the fact that wealthy people with influence find themselves more comfortable in a world full of private defense armies and essentially, little kingdoms with little governments.