"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 04:08 PM CDT

An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"

News ArchiveTwo weeks ago I found my name on a government list regarding the current "Green Scare," also known as the FBI's "Operation Backfire" against the grassroots ecology and animal movements. The mysterious "No Contact" list contains the names of many radical, wonderful people - the people that perhaps would be the most outspoken in their support of those charged in this case - and for some unknown reason these people are supposedly banned from communicating with the defendants. I have tried to find out exactly what the list means, yet I've found no solid answers, but instead a general sense of paranoia, confusion and unease. An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"

Memory Against Forgetting - An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"

Please repost & print widely

~~~~~~~~~~

"The struggle of humanity against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting."
- Milan Kundera

Two weeks ago I found my name on a government list regarding the current "Green Scare," also known as the FBI's "Operation Backfire" against the grassroots ecology and animal movements. The mysterious "No Contact" list contains the names of many radical, wonderful people - the people that perhaps would be the most outspoken in their support of those charged in this case - and for some unknown reason these people are supposedly banned from communicating with the defendants. I have tried to find out exactly what the list means, yet I've found no solid answers, but instead a general sense of paranoia, confusion and unease. I've come to view this ridiculous list as symbolic of the whole Green Scare campaign. Check it out at: portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/02/333236.shtml.

The U.S. government excels at dropping down on people's lives like a ton of bricks, and of course that's what it has done with this witch hunt. In the last couple months, it has incarcerated or otherwise hammered many amazing radicals, thereby traumatizing them, their friends, families, and movements. Federal prosecutors have also set a new standard for potential sabotage penalties: life in jail plus, oh, say, about 300 years.

The personal reality for the people and their loved ones facing this repression is sad enough. But to make matters worse is the apparent success with which the government has isolated the accused from their comrades and movements. We need to look at how the state has succeeded, to a large degree, in cutting off each of these people from communicating with one another or their political allies. This isolation has surely caused some of them to break their solidarity with each other and cooperate with the prosecution.

Meanwhile, families and friends who aren't part of a movement may understandably want to look after their own first, given the potentially huge prison sentences hanging in the air. The dilemma being faced for the movements, each targeted individual, and their supporters, is essentially the classic "prisoner's dilemma." If everyone persecuted by the government sticks together, the end result will be better overall for *both* the group and the individuals involved. When their solidarity is broken and some cooperate against the others, the end result is worse overall for the group, usually much worse for the individuals who don't cooperate, and often not much better for cooperators.

The question is how can these individuals-sitting alone after arrest for 23.5 hours a day in cold cells and facing decades of jail time or even multiple life sentences-have the strength to resist? Our movements, while definitely having a major impact, are not strong enough to adequately protect those facing persecution. And as Americans, we are raised to be isolated individuals. It's a cultural imperative to look after Number One first, and then some of our family and friends after that. But outside of that little circle, there is hardly any solidarity in our society across political, class, gender, sexuality, or race lines.

I want to offer up a view of these people that differs from either the evil geniuses fiendishly plotting to terrorize America presented by one side, or the angelic innocents who have never had an angry political thought in their lives claimed by the other. Out of respect for these individuals and their legal situations, I want to be clear that I'm not speaking about anyone in particular. When I write "these people," I'm referring to those already indicted, subpoenaed or harassed, as well as those to come. The discovery evidence coming from the government apparently shows that the informant Jake named approximately 60 people in his crusade, so the fallout will continue to widen like ripples on water (depending, in part, how much we let it).

When I think of these folks, I think of people who put everything on the line for their beliefs. I see them courageously blockading forest roads in the middle of nowhere from crazed loggers and cops; hanging huge banners from daunting heights off bridges and office buildings; hiking miles into a forest and setting up tree-sits in the darkness, rain and snow; disrupting bear, cougar, whale, wolf and shark hunts, on sea and land and frozen lakes, all the way up and down the Pacific coast and interior; dodging rubber bullets and wading through clouds of tear gas to shut down the WTO in Seattle; splattering eco-villains with creme pies; locking their bodies down to every kind of object in order to stop every kind of destructive activity; typing away at a computer or photocopying fliers in the neon glow of Kinko's while everyone else is asleep; driving through the night to make it to the next basecamp or demo; and I see them laughing and singing around a campfire under lush old-growth forest canopies and star-swept desert skies.

I also remember people who thought holistically, who refused to be blinded by single issue activism, who saw the links between the exploitation of animals, of humans, of the Earth. People who realized that capitalism and authoritarian governments of all stripes are killing everything good, not just wilderness. The kind of people, ultimately, most dangerous to a repressive government and its loyal opposition of weak-kneed environmental "non-profit" corporations.

In this time, we need solidarity from other movements. And to get that solidarity we need to communicate that the accused weren't hairy Cro Magnons living in caves outside of Eugene (or Tora Bora, for that matter). Yes, they have been involved in vital ecological and animal struggles, but they've been involved in many other social movements as well.

I am proud to know many of these folks and call them my friends. I am proud of who they were then, and who they are now. They are neither martyrs nor victims. Yes, they are truly gentle and kind people as has often been remarked, but they are also fierce fighters who let their passion for justice guide them. Whether in jail, on home arrest, facing grand juries, or "believed to have fled the country," y'all are in our thoughts and our heartbeats constantly.

This persecution comes as a result of the effectiveness of the grassroots ecology and animal movements, and also because the state needs to have an "Enemy Within" to justify its growing fascism. The government is shifting, as predicted, from using the word "terrorist" to "extremist." It's only one step from there to "radical," or "subversive," or "agitator." And those words closely shadow the word "activist." This is a historical moment for our movements, like it was for the Industrial Workers of the World during the Palmer raids.

We've all heard the saying, "united we stand, divided we fall." Though it's become cliche, it's also absolutely true. Knowing it to be true does not make it easier to break this cycle of repression and take a leap of faith in trusting each other, but it is our only way out. Even in the darkest moments, we must remember the strength of our collective power.

The feds have stuck a knife into our movements, and we're bleeding. We urgently need to stem the flow and get back on our feet. I'm hoping this open letter will provoke thought, discussion, action, and engagement. Like memory against forgetting, let's remember who we were and what we accomplished before this ton of bricks dropped. Everyone has a role to play, so let's get it on.

With love for Rebel Cascadia,
Al D.
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare" | 32 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 27 2006 @ 03:19 PM CST
this letter is very thoughtful and i hope it does facilitate important discussions about how we can resist state repression when it comes crashing down on our communities, comrades, and ourselves.

however, as communities in resistance, we CANNOT support, under any circumstances, people who have betrayed comrades or are willing to cooperate with the government in destroying the communities we have fought tooth and nail to create.

it can be hard to see old friends turn into collaborators and snitches, and even though one could understand the motives that would perhaps affect a prisoner, we CANNOT support these people if our resistance is to mean anything or survive long-term.

our energy needs to go into supporting the people who are resisting the power of the state and are refusing to cooperate. we need to keep these people's spirits strong, because they are facing the full might of the state and remain true to their beliefs and communities.

the KNOWN cooperating witnesses in this case are:

jacob fergusen
stanislas meyerhoff
kendell tankersly/sarah harvey
kevin tubbs
jenn kolar

all of these people have been revealed as cooperating witnesses in either court documents or court proceedings. fond memories of the past cannot erase the present, and the present shows that the above people are willing to cooperate with the government in it's attempt to put activists behind bars for life.
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Admin on Monday, February 27 2006 @ 03:24 PM CST
On the other hand, we should be cautious about branding activists snitches and so on. We often don't have all the information about what is going on AND it is possible that the authorities are spreading disinformation in order to get accused activists to "cooperate" and get other activists to stop supporting them.

I think that it is more responsible to organize support for accused activists and minimize all of this sensational stuff about "snitches." Please don't assume that these situations are so cut and dried.

Chuck
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 27 2006 @ 04:37 PM CST
How do you know they're snitches? how do you know the gov't didn't make it up to play us against each other?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 27 2006 @ 10:47 PM CST
"social expulsion is not irrevocable. if we don't act on information that is reasonably verified, than we sit powerless to state repression. the information about the known collaborators is verified. now we must act on it."

exactly. if the information is good, then we must act upon it. sometimes our comrades might be the target of State agents, but if we act smart and rational, the State bullshit will slide and the true traitors will show, and then we can show them the concequences of being State cock-suckers.
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 27 2006 @ 11:06 PM CST
gee, i agree with you, but damn, cut the heterosexist bullshit. penis/man/power; cocksucker/woman/gay/powerless
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 12:44 AM CST
yeah, what's up with this homophobic "cock-sucker" bullshit?!! as a queer
person who in general does not support ELF-style actions but has gone
out of their way to support one of (non-cooperating) indicted persons,
you are really going out of your way to offend me. check your
homophobia.
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 01:13 AM CST
Snitchjackets?

A common tactic of cops is to paint people as snitches to isolate them from their support. We wil find out who snitched and who didn't come trial time. Why jump to conclusions?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 12:26 PM CST
wake up motherfucker and read the fucking indictments! there are 5 cooperating witnesses (CWs) listed and their names have been verified by the Civil Liberties Defense Center-- how much more info do you need? one of the 5 CWs snitching on your ass to make you believe?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 02:55 PM CST
The evidence isn't in yet. Read about COINTELPRO and the Black Panthers or AIM. Those movements were torn apart by snitchjacketing. Read about Stokley Carmichael or the New Haven Black Panthers. Is history doomed to repeat itself so soon?

I've been interogated by cops who tried to convice me my friends have ratted on me so I would rat on them. It almost worked, except that I don't believe what cops say and you should never trust your enemy.

But anarchists on this thread trust the state on these matters?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 03:20 PM CST
the point, as always, is if we have good ifnormation, we need to act on it. social explusion, isn't irrevocable. we have good information. this isn't a case where our information comes from the allegations of cops who are interrogating people.

these people ARE cooperating. they have been outed by defense attorneys who have seen their testimony which is being used against their clients, or very reluctantly outed by cops under oath in the context of "this cooperating witness says x y or z". these circumstances are quite different than some random allegations as you suggest.

also, ms/mr "it almost worked on me"-- what should we do about the fact that people DO snitch? open our arms to them and show the state and potential snitches that there are NO repercussions to betraying your community?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 08:16 AM CST
If I were homophobic, I wouldn't be advancing LGBT liberation where I am. But, anyway, I'm sorry that the term offends you, but its just a term that means, around here anyway, sucking up (no pun intended). It can be used to label straight females, too.

Anyway, sorry.
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 03:12 AM CST
I can only hope that there are other anarchists mileus on this planet that are less reactionary then the North American scene when it comes to "snitches"

Anyone who knows the story with Jeremy Hammond knows how paronoid these moralists(and they know who they are)
can get.

Wolverine
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 09:39 AM CST
i don't think the author is saying everyone should support the accused snitches. i think he could have made it more clear, but he's not saying to support them, he's analyzing the situation and how it came to be. and how we seriously need to defend the non-cooperators
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 09:54 AM CST
....pondering maybe whether if, before these nice, wonderful people turned into rats they had been subject to overwhelming support-- & I mean OVERWHELMING-they might not have turned? Is the author asking the question of, when someone is cooling with 23 hour lock down and looking down 23 years of it, what level of support would be required to keep people from giving up hope and snitching?

Maybe thats what I'm asking......What can we rise to?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 10:15 AM CST
anyone else having trouble with that link?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 12:16 PM CST
i have absolutely no idea what you mean about north american anarchists being "reactionary" about snitches.

snitches pose a serious threat to resistance against the state (in particular) and function to disrupt and disintegrate our already (lets be honest) fractured communties.

if you are out on the streets or the woods or the lab actually putting yourself on the line for what you believe in, snitches are not simply something to shake your head at, but a serious betrayal of comrades, principles, and community that must be dealt with if we are to actually pose a serious threat to Power.

as for "north americans" being "reactionary"-- perhaps you are unaware of the many groups who have had zero tolerence for snitches....the raf, ira, eta, the maquis. some of these groups were more successful than others at dealing with snitches, mainly because they dealt with the issue at a systemic level (had tightly knit communities, provided unprecedented prisoner support, had broad support from non-resistance sources) which works at the root causes of snitching, but if someone did snitch...you better fucking believe they didn't just sit there shrugging their shoulders whining about "maybe this is just government provocation" blah blah blah. when you are facing life in prison because others are willing to throw you to the wolves, then lets talk about how "reactionary" the people who call a snitch a fucking snitch are.
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Admin on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 04:19 PM CST
Oh brother, I leave town for one day and all of a sudden people think they are involved in some Third World revolution.

Your posting is a good example of why we should be careful about publicly condemning people as "snitches." It's really easy to go around and condemn people. It's much harder to organize support campaigns for people in legal trouble or in jail. I think that any rational person should be skeptical about claims that people are snitches, until the facts are verified AND some time has passed to allow legal crap to play out. Given the irresponsible tendencies of American activists to engage in rumor campaign, snitch-jasketing, vigilantism, and so on, we should err on the side of caution.

When people start spreading rumors about you as an activist, you'll understand better what I'm talking about. There's little worse than dedicating decades of your life to the struggle, only to have some jackasses going around spreading lies about you.

Chuck
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 11:36 PM CST
Chuck,

being serious about snitches and state repression does not mean that anyone is deluded that we're fighting in some third world revolution (odd that you said that, all of the examples i gave are of comparably affluent "western" countries, but i digress).

just because you have been on the wrong side of a campaign by fucked up commie groups trying to discredit you doesn't mean that everyone who is labeled a snitch or collaborator is wrongfully labelled as such. we need information that is reliable about snitches and when that information does come about we need to do something about it. the information about the 5 CWs in this case is reliable and verified, so why the hesitation?

maybe we aren't at a point where our resistance can seriously take down Power, but if it is ever to develop into something which can, we are going to have to work on strategies in dealing with collaborators and snitches. simply waiting with our heads in the sand when reliable information is given is NOT a good way to deal with things.

i might also add that although the claims against you were fucking ridiculous and hurtful, did anyone in the anarchist community ever believe them?
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, March 01 2006 @ 12:10 AM CST
"i might also add that although the claims against you were fucking ridiculous and hurtful, did anyone in the anarchist community ever believe them?"

I don't know, but I suspect that this kind of thing does hurt my reputation and cause people not to work with me. It's probably disrupted organizing that I've done with groups. It may have caused some people not to donate money, resources or articles to this project. I think that most of it really has taken place among people who aren't anarchists.

I think my personal experience has some relevance, but I don't want to use that to diminish other people's concerns.

I'm angry too about people who make deals with the state. It's really stupid, because the odds are that the cases will be dismissed if people hang together. I'm in favor of spreading the word about snitches, but we need to be careful about how this is done. We have to understand that these situations can be complicated. I think that awareness about snitches and agents should be first done at the local level where people know each other better. After a period of time, then you tell people more broadly.

One example of this, which some of you know about, si the case of that guy who was going to Earth First gatherings and doing shit. It gets to the point where you have to spread the word more broadly, because people like him trave around.

Right now I'm investigating a possible snitch in our community, but I wouldn't go public with any information until I was absolutely sure about the suspicions.

Chuck
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 04:27 PM CST
I'm still undecided about the jeremy issue. Some people, like you said "they know who they are", make the issue black and white. It is well known that he talked too much and didn't practice secruity culture very well considering what he was doing. However, the reason he has been outed from the community is because he turned in a tape to the feds/police and it showed some faces. No one was busted, in fact it cleared him and two other inoccent people of serious crimes, but the fact remains that he turned info over to save his own skin. However he gave no names, places, or details of actions to ANYONE. All they got was a tape with 20 or so faces. Now it goes without saying that they should have been masked considering what they were doing. This makes it partly, but a VERY small part, their falt for not masking up. The actual damage the tape did to the community is almost non-existant, the actual debate over whether Jeremy should be outed did alot more harm. Yes, what he did was stupid and selfish but then again the reaction to it was over the top. The punishment didn't fit the crime.
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 05:26 PM CST
The fucking punishment didnt fit the crime???? Maybe we should let him hang out some more so he can burn us even worse down the road. This no harm no foul argument is complete bullshit. Plain and simple if you willingly turn over information that could get others locked up to save your own ass then you are a SNITCH and you will be treated as such.
Jeremy Hammond
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 03 2006 @ 02:24 PM CST
...is a douchebag for so many other reasons as well...
Jeremy Hammond
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 12 2007 @ 11:41 AM CST
I love Jeremy he is a wonderful person and very inspiring.


I think you are garbage.
Jeremy Hammond
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 12 2007 @ 11:56 AM CST
He has put his shit on the line more than most chicago activists I know, is more passionate, more creative, more interesting, and more dedicated. He is damn sexy too.
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 10:24 PM CST
chuck: why not stop preaching a general and abstract skepticism and respond to those people who have made specific assertions regarding those who have been labelled snitches?

Are their defense attorneys "snitchjacketing"? Was Meyerhoff joking when he condemned all his co-defendents who hadn't "renounced these crimes" to become "students and professionals"?
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 11:26 PM CST
"but the fact remains that he turned info over to save his own skin. "

Goodness me, dear anyone act in their own self-interest. What do you desire, an army of altruists.

I'm not saying people should just snitch in a vindictive manner, however people forget about the biopolitical complex and the disliplinary measures it drills through people including not just Jeremy but Bill Cottrell as well(yes I'll defend even him).

Many of these snitches never just set out to ruin peoples lives. There's some pretty signicant external forces that go into these confessions. I would hope that if the modern complex ever becomes ash in our lifetime I hope that we can all accept each other with open arms(including those who gave into the pressure) And in this new world I hope that the ghosts of altruism(seen here) can be fully excorcised. Cause goodness knows the state and civilized order in general can't feed on that enough.

The last thing we should be creating is this molecular form of statist moralism.

Wolverine
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 01 2006 @ 09:45 AM CST

"Many of these snitches never just set out to ruin peoples lives."

A snitches intent is irrelevant.

There's some pretty signicant external forces that go into these confessions."

No shit. Look at all the folks that didnt, havent, and will never snitch. Stop making excuses for a few who lack backbone.

"I'm not saying people should just snitch in a vindictive manner".

So what the fuck are you saying? People should snitch in a compassionate manner? Again more snitch apologist dribble.

"..... however people forget about the biopolitical complex and the disliplinary measures it drills through people."

Blah Blah Blah. No most people in the struggle dont forget. Its called security culture.

"... including not just Jeremy but Bill Cottrell as well(yes I'll defend even him)."

WHOOMP THERE IS! In the words of DMX Fuck what you heard its what your hearing!
An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 01 2006 @ 09:22 PM CST
"A snitches intent is irrelevant. "

Says the Zebra

"No shit. Look at all the folks that didnt, havent, and will never snitch. Stop making excuses for a few who lack backbone."

You sound like a statist general who ostrisizes someone for not standing up to torture. People and situations are different you moralist(they tend to like backbones)

"So what the fuck are you saying? People should snitch in a compassionate manner? Again more snitch apologist dribble."

I'm saying police confession has contexts which certain people with Zebra bineries can't see.

"Blah Blah Blah. No most people in the struggle dont forget. Its called security culture."

Know one really knows untill they're subjected to it

Wolverine


An Open Letter on the
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 02 2006 @ 02:00 PM CST
Dude Wolverine every time I read your posts Johnny Rivers starts singing in my head. I bet you can guess the song.

Mad love and respect to all the PP/POWS and Grand Jury resisters out there. A big zebra kick in the ass to all the snitches their supporters. Im out, talk to the hoof Byyyyyytch!
An Open Letter on the "Green Scare"
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 03 2006 @ 10:03 PM CST
"Anyone who knows the story with Jeremy Hammond knows how paronoid these moralists(and they know who they are)
can get."

I second that wholeheartedly.

-cyfer
P.S. to the "Open Letter"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, March 06 2006 @ 08:00 AM CST
i've seen this "p.s." added on several lists, but apparently not here on infoshop.

"A debate has taken place on infoshop.org in response to my "open letter" on whether it's acceptable to snitch. My intention was never to condone or excuse snitching in any way, but to try and focus on *why* this is happening so horribly in the case of the Green Scare so far. Only with analysis and calling it out can we hope to stop it.

Snitching and other abusive behaviors have no place in our struggles for change. Feminists have been saying this a long time but have been silenced or pushed out because it wasn't a group's "focus." Well, maybe now it will be.

Some day (and the sooner, the better), I hope it will be known what these people went through when they decided to snitch. Who knows, maybe we'll find out the ones in jail were hands-on tortured or fed drugs. For the ones who were never incarcerated and yet rolled, what were the buttons the FBI pushed?

For the time being, it should be said that no movement can survive without a strong policy against snitching. Even in movements whose members faced immediate, severe physical torture upon capture, there were policies that the incarcerated must try and resist for at long as possible.

With the changing political climate, even banner-hangers or people espousing ideas in a manner protected by Constitution will be prosecuted as felons. People need to consider this before doing anything, and if they decide they probably couldn't resist cooperating with the government against their comrades, then they shouldn't do it.

~Al D. "
There is no debate on snitching
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 12 2007 @ 01:36 PM CST
Or, if there is