"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 03:58 PM CDT

Get Your Anarchy On

News ArchiveSome thoughts about anarchists taking action. Get Your Anarchy On

By C.
for Infoshop News
February 2, 2006

I have to admit that despite the overall growth in the number of anarchists in the U.SA., the anarchist movement has been way to quiet of late. While anarchism is becoming the de facto political philosophy of radicals in the U.S., we are currently missing an opportunity to initiate more direct action, activism, and dissent. In the two years after Seattle, anarchists were key players in setting the agenda of the American left. Right now there are lots of anarchists and they are busy working with other groups and doing local projects, but we just aren't acting as the catalysts for social change that we should be acting as.

Anarchists have always been a bit wary of stepping up and showing leadership. We abhor vanguardism and we detest authoritarian leaders. We anarchists rightfully place emphasis on grassroots activism and decentralized power within our movements. We are good at networking organizations and people. We are good at direct action and not obeying orders, be they police orders or liberals telling us what we can and cannot do. We anarchists are also skeptical of traditional mass-based movements which tend to serve the agenda of a small group of wannabe kings and queens and commissars.

There is nothing wrong with stepping up, getting the ball rolling and serving as a catalysts for social change. I think that we anarchists in the U.S. need to do more of this right now, on everything from anti-war and anti-capitalist organizing to alternative media to workplace organizing and, most importantly, on saving the environment and the planet. This will entail thinking big and will require for us as anarchists to set aside some of our petty differences and work together.

Some of my comrades at this point are thinking "We need more organization." Yes, we need more organizations, but as tools to an end and not an end in themselves. We need anarchist organizations that achieve results, not more organizations whose main purpose is to spread the gospel about their brand of politics. When you get right down to it, most of us anarchists are on the same page, so the important questions involve what we should be doing, how, with whom, when and so on.

I think we need more anarchist organizations at the local and regional level. The purpose of these organizations should not be about mission statements and platforms, rather on action, campaigns, education, coalitions, and acheiving results for their members and the greater community. We need these anarchist organizations as places for anarchists to work together, to share ideas, to enjoy community, and to give us a base to do bigger things.

We also should continue our work with and within other groups. Many anarchists are involved with national and local anti-war groups. We are involved with Indymedia, local food co-ops, unions, environmental campaigns, anti-oppression groups, housing co-ops, and much more. We need to continue this kind of activism, but I think we also benefit by being more out about our anarchist politics. This doesn't mean converting the local peace group to anarchism, but it does mean making it known to people that you are an anarchist or anti-authoritarian. An older anarchists need to be more open, if only to dispel hateful disinformation about anarchists all being "young people who are going through a stage." Have you ever heard of a Democrat or Republican being accused of being young and "going through a stage"?

Anarchists have been smart to not emulate the ineffective tactics of groups such as ANSWER and UFPJ. People have asked us why we don't do the same thing as these groups. The answer--pardon the pun--is that these groups have been implementing really bad, self-seriving strategies. But we anarchists haven't exactly been visible about our alternatives--we haven't supported efforts such as the Anti-Authoritarian Antiwar Network, for example. I think that we anarchists need to put together some more visible campaigns, ones that don't rely on marching around Washington and San Francisco. We need to initiate campaigns that just don't knee-jerk against George Bush, but which aim to end the ENTIRE war machine and rid the world of nuclear weapons. The current anti-war and peace movements are just thinking too small.

I think we also need to organize and re-energize the anti-capitalist movement. Many people screamed that they were tired of summit convergences--which were effective for us and scaring the capitalists--they advocated for more local protests and action. Given that we've seen little to no evidence of this local activism, it's safe to assume that these people who were tired of convergence protests were armchair activists who had no intention of implementing their local strategy.

Of course, local activism and grassroots organizing is very important. Seattle, J18, Quebec City, and other summit protests couldn't have been successful without years of local activism and dissent. But if you aren't doing summit protests or local campaigns, you aren't doing anything, are you?

If you aren't resisting and protesting and disobeying in this capitalist system, then you are merely a privileged American who may be upset about issues, but aren't willing to do anything to change things.

The good news is that there are more people who think like us than ever before. We live in a country with vast material wealth and resources we can tap into. Contrary to the alarmist news you read on this website and other places, the U.S. government is not an omnipotent oppressor of dissenters. We are actually doing less when we have more freedom that our comrades in past eras, such as the 1960s. Many, many people are mad at the U.S. government right now. Many normal Americans. This will make it harder for the government to control us. Sure, the government has put some of us in jail and prisons, but we are still better off than our comrades in the 1960s.

It's easy to write a mess of words, especially the stream of consciousness rant that is this essay. I want to do more to work with other anarchists who want to be catalysts for social change. I'm willing to help set up new campaigns and organizations. Let's think big and take the lead in the anti-war movement. Let's start more campaigns against capitalists, including direct action in workplaces. Let's get more active in Indymedia and publish more newspapers. Let's start our own cable TV network. Let's plant flowers where we aren't supposed to. let's thumb our nose at authority and urge people to skip work and drop out of school. Let's work together and take action.

What do we have to lose?

Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Get Your Anarchy On | 20 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 05:37 PM CST
We don't need more "organizations" we need more "organization". There is a HUGE difference between the two. I think us having as many different organizations only weakens us in areas we need to be stronger in.

Just my thought from my perspective.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 05:55 PM CST
What do you mean? Are you talking about one big organization or organization in the sense of planning, coordination, communication, accounting and so on?

We could stand to be more organized, but I see a bigger need for setting broader goals and attending to nitty gritty things like getting people to do more volunteer work. For example, I'm pretty organized, but I could do more with Infoshop if we had the resources. Like having an office, something most organizations have.

C.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 06:34 PM CST
We need more community outreach, and, yes, more direct action of all kinds, including sit-ins, blockades, and, yes, property destruction. Hopefully not all property destruction.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 07:40 PM CST
Organizations, as opposed to organization, made Seattle.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 07:55 PM CST
Yes and no. It was a combination of movements, networks, campaigns, and organizations that made Seattle. Organizations like DAN and Ruckus organized much of the ground work for the Seattle protests. The anti-capitalist, anti-globalization and anarchist networks built up the momentum towards Seattle with protests such as J18. PGA helped set the agenda for the anti-capitalists and groups like Jubilee 2000 helped organize the liberal/religious movement. Then there were the labor unions. The independent media network/movement and Indymedia and Infoshop.

Read the articles on "netwar" for a description of the networks and movements that took inspiration from the Zapatistas and led up to Seattle.

Then there were all of the activists campaigns. The student anti-sweatshop movement. The anti-roads movement in the U.K. Reclaim the Streets and Critical Mass, especially the big CM year in San Francisco in the late 1990s. Or how about the new blood that joined the IWW after the Borders campaign? You also have to give credit to all of the environmental activism.

Anarchists were doing lots of organizing in the years leading up to Seattle. Trace back anarchist activism to events like Active Resistance in 1996 in Chicago.

The important thing to keep in mind is that there was lots of stuff happening before Seattle. People were active in many different campaigns, networks, movements and organizations. Seattle didn't just happen. Oh, and the leftover Left like the ISO and the RCP were a nonfactor in Seattle and the years leading up to it.

C.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anarchodude on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 09:10 PM CST
You people need to start thinking bigger than Seattle.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 10:57 PM CST
"let's thumb our nose at authority and urge people to skip work and drop out of school."

I don't think this is really the right idea. This just reinforces the stereotype of anarchists of being "rebellious" young people or unemployed people who think they're stopping capitalism by receiving an unemployed benefit.

I think rather than skipping work or school we should be making schools and workplaces more democratic and controlled by those who work and study at them.
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 11:09 PM CST
I think rather than skipping work or school we should be making schools and workplaces more democratic and controlled by those who work and study at them.

Anarchists are doing both. We can skip THEIR schools, and make OUR OWN. And by making the workplace more democratic, we have more chances to skip work!

diversity of tactics
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, February 02 2006 @ 11:14 PM CST

Efforts to make schools and workplaces more democratic are called reformism. We anarchists are nowhere close to having the numbers, resources and power to reform the current school system. What we have to offer are radical alternatives. We can encourage anarchist home-schooling, deschooling and alternative schools. Actually, anarchists have been working on alternatives to education for over a century. The worst thing we can offer is some half-ass efforts to reform schools. If anything, we should be networking with students and parents who are unhappy with the current system. As for work, sure, we can organize workplaces, but I also think we want to abolish workplaces. We want a world without Wal-mart and McDonalds, not one where Wal-mart is run by anarchists!

C.

diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 10:05 AM CST
I support organizing in schools to "reform" them. I think if students/teachers are involved in changing the schools through organizations on the inside, that aren't part of the the actual schools, that will give people a good lesson on organizing and empowerment. We don't have to reinvent the wheel in every fucking thing in our society. The school system in pretty close to functioning alright and I don't think there should ever be a world where "anarchist schools" are the main places where people learn. We can change things in our society now and push them in an anarchist direction without having to come up with a whole new way to "revolutionize" them.

I agree with the guy above, stop worrying about Seattle. And I'd like to ad that there is not nearly enough anarchist community organizing going on in the US as this article would make it seem. We need organizing beyond Food Not Bombs, where projects connect from one to the next, and bring normal people into them...not isolate themselves in activist ghettos.

just my thoughts.
diversity of tactics
Authored by: MagonistaRevolt on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 10:19 AM CST
the separation of education and life in the institution called schooling is a huge tragedy. The ghettoization of education into a 6 hour period once per day, in which totalitarian authority rules the minutia of every students' life (Got a hall pass? Raise your hand and wait to be told to speak! Run here when the bell rings! Leave early and we'll arrest you for truancy!) is destroying our children. Natural fervor for education is stomped out in public schools in favor of rote memorization and social control.

The school system was created by captains of industry and the government as a mechanism of social control, a way to keep laborers poor and laboring. This is well documented. Check out http://www.johntaylorgatto.com

Education should never be so separate from life as it is today. Light reform will do nothing to undermine the foundation of the schooling system, which is anathema to anarchists. Education should be free, voluntary, and inseperrable from life.
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 10:30 AM CST
so what practical alternative do you see for education? I believe schools can slowly be taken over by the organizing within, and when we hit a revolutionary point in the US, that is when the real change will come...but leading up to that, people can learn by organizing student strikes and everything else on the inside (after all, school is mandatory, and dropping out doesn't help anyone living under capitalism).
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Admin on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 10:21 AM CST
There is plenty of anarchist organizing going on out there beyond Food Not Bombs. We could be doing more because we have the people and resources.

Chuck
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 07:17 PM CST
i've tried to find a book on the 80-or-so years on anarchist organizing leading up the the spanish civil war. please recomend one if you can, but i can't find any. the reason i say this, though, is in response to "<i> I don't think there should ever be a world where "anarchist schools" are the main places where people learn</i>", because from what i gather, "anarchist schools" were a large organizing and empowering point for the anarchists. similarly, i wish i could find something or talk to someone about the zapatista organizing, pre-1994.

i think there are plenty of problems with schools. how many parents have you met that were angry over school board descisions, superintendant or principal descisions, treatment of their kids that is disrespectful or nonconsentual (by parent or child)? as an anarchist, i don't have an urge to reinvent everything. soemtimes, it's just overwhelming that i see something wrong with every structure around, but i realize that so many structures don't have much to do with a people's tradition or even way of doing things, but of capital or political workings that have swayed and set things for a long, long time.
making schools more democratic is not reformism
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 03:02 PM CST
There are radical student unions in high schools and universities all over the world. In the US, besides the SDS, the IWW is also organizing students within universities.

It's all about anarchizing the institution, breaking it open for all the world.
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, February 04 2006 @ 01:12 AM CST
Ah, the age old argument. Reform vs. revolution. Well, in my honest
opinion, some reforms have to be made from the bottom up. Those
reforms will hopefully give people a vision for a better world and society.
As more radical "reforms" are sought by the people, politicians and the
ruling class will fight against the will of the people. This will then
hopefully spark a revolutionary spirit among the masses realizing that
reform only gets you so far. But, without the vision of a new society,
people feel powerless and devoid of hope. But, what do I know...
diversity of tactics
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 03:42 AM CST
Very constructive -- promoting self-employment. I believe a little more economic independence goes a long way toward giving people more options.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 06:14 PM CST
Ultimate destination of the school complex should be to the ashheap
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 06:20 PM CST
There are free schools in existance. In Minneapolis we have the Bat Annex free school which. ironically, many of the activisty anarchists leave to the subcultural types that they disdain. I think a big step for anarchists would be for us to get off our high horses once every great while and try to actually do something imperfect though it might be.
Get Your Anarchy On
Authored by: bk on Friday, February 03 2006 @ 06:29 PM CST
There's a great free school in Albany, NY too. It tends to serve as a hub for local organizers.