Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 09:23 PM UTC

Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts

KatrinaThe American public is highly critical of President Bush's handling of Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. Two-in-three Americans (67%) believe he could have done more to speed up relief efforts, while just 28% think he did all he could to get them going quickly. Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts

Huge Racial Divide Over Katrina and Its Consequences

The American public is highly critical of President Bush's handling of Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. Two-in-three Americans (67%) believe he could have done more to speed up relief efforts, while just 28% think he did all he could to get them going quickly. At the same time, Bush's overall job approval rating has slipped to 40% and his disapproval rating has climbed to 52%, among the highest for his presidency. Uncharacteristically, the president's ratings have slipped most among his core constituents - Republicans and conservatives.

The disaster has triggered a major shift in public priorities. For the first time since the 9/11 terror attacks, a majority of American say it is more important for the president to focus on domestic policy than the war on terrorism. And the poll finds that Katrina has had a profound psychological impact on the public. Americans are depressed, angry and very worried about the economic consequences of the disaster. Fully 58% of respondents say they have felt depressed because of what's happened in areas affected by the storm. In recent years, this percentage is only surpassed by the 71% that reported feeling depressed in a survey taken just days after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Sept. 6-7 among 1,000 Americans, including an oversample of African Americans, finds a huge racial divide in perceptions of the disaster and lessons to be learned from Katrina's aftermath. For example, 71% of blacks say the disaster shows that racial inequality remains a major problem in the country; a majority of whites (56%) feel this was not a particularly important lesson of the disaster. And while 66% of blacks think that the government's response to the crisis would have been faster if most of the storm's victims had been white, an even larger percentage of whites (77%) disagree.

The survey finds that while the hurricane has drawn broad public attention, spiraling gas prices have attracted as much interest as reports on the storm's impact. Roughly seven-in-ten are paying close attention to each story (71% gas prices, 70% hurricane's impact). That represents the highest level of interest in gas prices in the two decades of Pew's News Interest Index.

View complete report http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=255

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20050908112515951

No trackback comments for this entry.
Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts | 4 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 08 2005 @ 03:26 PM UTC
There have been numerous polls, but 3 of the top ones released yesterday and today have shown nearly the same figures. The other two: Zogby;, CBS;

I like Pew because it breaks down response by race and source of news, not just party affiliation.

What does this mean for us? People are strongly critical of the federal government. Bush's popularity is sinking fast. But who knows how long that will last. If the Weakling Party somehow screws it up, CNN et al go back to the usual bullshit of being uncritical of comments made by the administration and their supporters (only criticism comes when they have 2 people duel it out, which turns it into an issue of opinion and not accuracy), nothing will be any different.

We are nowhere on the map, except our own maps. In our own world, we're everywhere. Taking two steps back into everyday life, we don't exist. So, I suppose, no matter how much the people hate the government, president, and corporations, if they are not aware of us, we're not there on a noticeable scale, it really makes no difference. Whoever people do notice and can put their faith in to will benefit.
Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts
Authored by: Admin on Thursday, September 08 2005 @ 03:44 PM UTC
I talked earlier today to an anarchist comrade whose political analysis is usually spot on. The comrade explained that this situation is leading to a bigger situation in American society where there will be widespread distrust and hostility towards public institutions such as the government, the "two" wings of the Corporate Party, corporations, the media, the police and so on. There was already huge levels of distrust towards public institutions, so the situation is just becoming more favorable to anarchists and anti-authoritarians. We've once again entered the "anarchist moment" that we created after Seattle. It's important for us anarchists to be proactive NOW and not sit back waiting for stuff to happen or wasting too much time on sectarianism.

My friend also pointed out that, while the current crisis will sink Bush and the Republicans, the Republicans will still do well in the 2006 elections. This is because the Democrats are incompetent, have no spine, and are no different than the Republicans. With a growing majority of Americans gravitating towards distrust and hostility towards "the man" and the American system, they won't support change at the ballot box, not even if it means voting for the Democrats.

We have entered a period similar to the post-Watergate era in the 1970s where many Americans were alienated from government and everything to do with "the system." If anarchists want to make some inroads against the state and the system, the next few years will provide us with the right opportunity. We have to be smart about this and not get swamped by sectarianism, fatalism, navel-gazing, or the disempowering determinism of the failed American Left (i.e. we can't do anything until the condition are right).

You make revolution happen, you don't wait for it to happen.

;-)

Chuck0
Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 08 2005 @ 05:33 PM UTC
I think we need to do what we can, but I'm not terribly optimistic since we do not currently register on the public conscience (we did briefly, flash in the pan briefly when considering all of American history post-colonization, at the height of the anti-glob movement here).

At the moment, our outreach would primarily be propaganda, with the exception of small projects here and there. People need an a large-scale option that offers them solutions to their problems right now, not in the distant future. Us bringing them some blankets and food is great, but if not done on a large scale, it's no different than small churches/charities donating the little bit they can collect. Good for people in the short term, but overall, people will only see two choices (ie, no options but what exists). If we try to explain our ways to them when giving charity, they'll probably tune it out like they would church groups (rightfully so). Long term solutions right now is what they (and we all) need and want.

We really have to start thinking "out of the box" like we never have before. I'm not referring to some abstract artistic fads, or printing 345843098503458 "anarchist" flyers at office depot to spread everywhere. I don't know. Do we have any think tanks? Heh.
Two-In-Three Critical Of Bush's Relief Efforts
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 08 2005 @ 05:37 PM UTC
I used "they" too freely. "They" at times mean the American public and other times means the victims of the recent, on-going disaster. I'm sure you can figure it out.