Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 08:12 PM UTC

Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?

FeminismThe Internet has created a porn explosion by opening huge new markets. In 1996, there were 30 million surfers, and in 2001, 500 million! The pornography business is mainly run from and between the economically developed countries but now reaches developing countries as well. Pornographic sites number about 450,000. By Jocelyne, Militant, Louise-Michel Group of the Fédération anarchiste, 2003.

Translated by SonofTomJoad, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 3/05

Original French @: http://increvablesanarchistes.org/articles/2000_apres/2003porno_liberat.htm

Most dictionaries define pornography as the self-indulgent representation of obscene acts that shock the prudish, a subjective and variable concept according to historical era, country and culture. What qualified as pornographic in the 18th century seems quaint to us today—a glimpse of a naked breast … or ankle. Pornography has both a provocative and a profitable dimension. Eroticism, however, can be just as titillating and saleable, but it depicts emotional and sexual experiences between consenting partners who want to increase their sexual pleasure together by playing erotic games to reach orgasm.

Pornography achieves no such effect. There are two categories of sexual partner in porn—
the dominators (men) and the dominated (women or children) used as objects. Sexuality serves as another means to create or reinforce inequality. Women (or children in the case of child pornography) are represented in degrading, shameful situations, showing that they can only find pleasure in submission and humiliation. Pornography apologizes for violence against women, and even children, in which men triumph as the dominant sex. Aside from the commercial aspect, pornography differs from eroticism in that it makes no aesthetic quest but only seeks a crude reality, limited to the genital organs or the scatological, as opposed to eroticism, which explains, or more often, suggests intimate situations. Pornography only displays the physical aspect of the body, while eroticism plays with the entire personality of the person.

Internet porn

Pornography has evolved over the centuries, with paintings discovered on the walls of the brothels of Antiquity and writings and songs sometimes serving as an outlet for official writers, but that evolution is microscopic compared to the exponential way it has developed over the past thirty years and how extremely violent its content has become. The Internet has created a porn explosion by opening huge new markets. In 1996, there were 30 million surfers, and in 2001, 500 million! The pornography business is mainly run from and between the economically developed countries but now reaches developing countries as well. Pornographic sites number about 450,000. They offer videos, photos, prostitute catalogues, sex shops and stores selling sexy lingerie, so women can excite their male partners. Web-cams allow some sites to offer direct visual relations with very young girls or children. Since communication has become so international and provides new markets for the sex industry, 2.5 % of total Internet traffic carries pornographic images, and users have the freedom to visit porn sites without much fear of being located, thanks to the anonymous complexity of the Web. Men comprise 95% of customers, according to polls, and they can watch scenes of torture, rape and lesser crimes if they like. The police have dismantled some sites because they involve minors. However, proposals for regulation are denounced in the name of freedom of expression and the right to privacy. The Internet is the communication space with the closest thing to a complete legal void at its disposal.

Pornography has become more violent over the last several decades. In 1976 in the US, the film Snuff provoked important demonstrations, especially of feminists, because it presented as real the torture, murder and dismemberment of a woman. This escalation of violence may be explicable as a response to the women's liberation movement born in the Seventies, which put male supremacy at risk! In 1976, pornographic movies released in France numbered about 11 million, and while that number fell to 2 million in 1985, in the same period there was a flourishing of sex shops, peep shows, sex chat lines, as well as the explosion of video sales. Porn film production is now the work of big media outfits like Vivendi Universal Canal +, which had a world monopoly on the market in 2001.

Content

Above all, pornography is a sex industry that uses all the methods necessary for its expansion. It produces a misogynistic vision of sexual relations between men and women based on inequality and the domination and violence of men against women, reflecting patriarchal society. Contrary to erotic-pornographic literature like Lady Chatterley's Lover, The Story of O, Lolita and Emmanuelle, which allow the reader's imagination to bring the description alive, the films do not allow the unconscious to re-appropriate the projected fantasies because they are more primitive and brutal and too fast. Active readers interpret words and situations by adapting them according to their personalities and lived experiences, thus paradoxically re-inventing the story. Images projected on the screen do not allow this distancing, this re-appropriation. They appear and vanish too quickly, not allowing the necessary reaction or unconscious adjustment, and so they are received passively.

Pornographic film content has evolved over the years to become more and more violent and brutal toward women (but also children). In this way, it mirrors capitalist society, which reinforces class inequalities and the inequality women have in relation to men. Women's bodies are shown as sexual objects, pieces of meat, of merchandise, with overused wide shots in order to better show penetrations of all orifices and the final (male) orgasm displayed by the emission of sperm. The penis is only filmed when erect, the patriarchal symbol of male power, never before or after. The ejaculation of sperm is dramatized as the erect saviour's awaited apotheosis flooding the sprawling body of the woman. Storylines are usually absent because these films only seek to satisfy the need of men to dominate women and even create that need (in the film's advertising). These films don't show sexuality between men and woman, which is not limited to penetration but involves the whole person. Fixating on the genital organs casts aside an important part of the human body connected to orgasm—the imagination. Physical orgasm is a component of sexuality between consenting partners that is not defined by penis size or trying to beat multiple penetration records but by a common quest for pleasure. Sexual pleasure is subjective and relative according to individuals; having a hard-on is not enough to achieve Completeness of Being.

A social evolution?

The unimaginative ubiquity of pornography, far from freeing individuals and destroying the religious taboos of our societies, only reinforces the foundations of capitalism and patriarchy. Money is the impetus and the goal of success (social success in the group and not personal success); social success can only be reached in an unequal social context in which force dominates, freedom is repressed, relations between the sexes are based on degradation, the domination of men over women reproduces itself— thereby encroaching on already acquired rights, returning to moral order, reinforcing the power of religion (diktats of integrationists and fundamentalists alike).

Access to more pornography only gives the illusion of a liberated society. Some women artists demand the right to do what they want with their bodies when, in fact, they are only participating in the market, cornered by men, that does what men want with the bodies of others (such as in the film Baise-moi) like they do in war. Changes in sexual behaviour remain linked to a liberal society endowed with the new alienating component of the pornography invasion that perpetuates the domination of an owning minority over all other people, such exploitation the very essence of capitalism. While some pornography feeds off extremely perverse situations—violence, torture, rape, murder—
it does not help to emancipate individuals and social groups. Despite the evolution of pornography that could be perceived as an outlet for mainly male aggression, which is the consequence of patriarchal society, sexual crimes have increased along with spousal abuse, while rape has not decreased, and the sexual exploitation of women, children and men in prostitution is growing.

There is no real sexual liberation because the spirit has not followed the body, and this dichotomy only brings low self-esteem. Emancipation does not come from more and more sex relations. Sexuality is part of well-being, but pornography, far from liberating people, keeps them dependent, and it only benefits and reinforces capitalist society at the expense of a libertarian society of adult and totally fulfilled people.

Are we going to let that happen?

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20050315083504610

No trackback comments for this entry.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement? | 17 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 11:17 AM UTC
When a critique of a whole industry (any whole industry) positions its
perspective from one who isn't directly being exploited from within that
industry, it's hard for me to take their argument seriously at all. Applying
an abstract and subjective value on whether or not such industry is
"liberating" or not, abuses the concrete material relationship between the
actual sex workers themselves. It ignores our experiences and attempts to
apply ideology to our experiences in the sense that: you are being
exploited, and its wrong, so people shouldn't like porn. That's like saying
the workers at the grocery store's labor is being exploited, and their lives
are degraded since we have no direct connection to our production, so
therefore, we call on people to not eat vegetables. That's crazy for one.
For two, liberation for workers in said industry needs to be defined by the
workers themselves. No outside judgement can be placed on our
exploitation, and in fact this kind of feminist thought was considered
classist over a decade ago. I don't see how this critique still stands 15
years later. Sexual liberation by sex workers means organizing ourselves
into unions and organizations that empower us as workers being exploited.
We need to build this power in order to pick apart how to dismantle its
expoitative relationship, and the kind of disempowering effects it has o
nthe society at large. If you are not active in aiding the organization of sex
workers for self-empowerment, then any kind of value judgement on the
production of the industry is simply from the sidelines and frankly not
helpful or welcome.
Improve your arguement
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16 2005 @ 09:47 AM UTC
Your reasoning isn't very sound. You could improve it if you addressed the following points:
- Why should someone have to be in an industry or directly exploited by an industry to critique it? I only *benefit* from the meat industry's cruelty to animals if I choose to eat the meat. Does this mean I can't critique it? Even if I was an outside observer, while you are right that I amy have no idea what is going on, I may also have some insight because of my outsider perspective. Also, one could critique pornography because of the effect it has on the viewer (whether or not watching porn increases rape, it still definetely affects people). I know many men who find fully shaved pubic areas -which make one look like a ten year old, not a woman- arousing because of their association with it and pornography. Thus, there are indirect effects, though you don't seem to find them important for some unknown reason.

-We aren't allowed to boycott something because people involved are exploited? Why not? The grocery store scenario is not parallel. We die if we don't eat. Also, the exploitation is less in some people's opinion, because one's sexuality is also commodified in pornography.

-Why can't people act on their own opinions, even if they aren't part of the sex industry? Why would I have to aid sex worker unionization, even if I personally find pornography to be degrading? Yes, a person has the right to personally find pornography to be degrading and voice this, even if the sex worker doesn't agree. This is valuable because other people (not on the industry side) may identify with this interpretation of porn.

Also, most of us are working on many different issues. We're not all going to work on sex worker unionization. So this means we can't critique the sex industry from our point of view? That's silly.

You don't even refute that you are being exploited! It sounds like you're just trying to promote pornography because it is how you make money. That's fine for you, but it doesn't make a rational or compelling arguement. I would be interested in your ideas, as I have mixed feelings on porn, with the above issues addressed.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16 2005 @ 12:16 PM UTC
I have a hard time buying the argument that only sex industry workers have the right to comment on, celebrate, or condemn pornography. The logic escapes me. While it is always good to listen from those involved in anything, that doesn't mean those outside of the industry--or those women and men who feel negatively affected by its existence--shouldn't get to comment.
I mean, I'm not a soldier, does that mean I can't criticize the war in Iraq? I'm not a politicain, does that mean I can't call them scumbags? Etc.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 28 2005 @ 06:45 AM UTC
some of you need to stop being so critical in the sense that your belittling people for what the think. debate, sure. offer what you thing on the subject but alienation is not whats going bring about freedom and equality. love your sisters and brothers god dammit!

YAC
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 11:22 AM UTC
This is an incredibly ignorant article about porn that sounds like it came from some right wing organization with some few pseudo-feminist rhetoric thrown it. As a feminist who enjoys a wide variety of porn, I can say that the author of this piece is very ignorant about porn. The porn industry? That's an old discredited critique of porn. Pornography is a genre of creative fiction, just like Westerns, Science Fiction and so on. There are large capitalist companies which make millions from porn, just as there are big publishers who make less money off of science fiction.

This piece also includes the canard that porn sets up men to be vicitimizers and women as victims. I'm sorry, but I like porn because it help me with fantasies that get me off. As a male feminist, I have a sexuality that is every bit as legitimate as any of my feminist sisters. Speaking of my radical sisters, I know that quite a few of them get off on porn. Other participate in the production of it, as creators, as performers, and so on. Porn can be empowering or disempowering, but neither is essential to porn. A porn movie producer can exploit a women perfromer just as badly as some corporation can exploit her in some office. Or she might hook up with a wonderful producer who is mindful of her needs and desires. And thanks to the Internet, many more women have taken a direct role in the production of porn. This article completely ignores the wide universe of DIY porn and instead opts for a shallow puritanical critique of porn.


Anarcho-feminist for porn
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 12:34 PM UTC
Im not entirely sure where I stand on the issue but it certainly is not as cut and dry as you may think. Just browse through porn sites these days and you'll see hundreds of women being abused and oppressed. Sites like exploitedteens, cumonherface, etc, etc, go just short of torture and rape, with gagging scenes, obvious mental abuse, using fear and vulnerability as weapons to get what they want from these kids. And alot of these sites are not huge corporate gigs, the most offensive are ususally the low key, home made jobs. I watch porn but am increasingly ashamed of it as I discover sites that openly degrad and abuse women and take glory in the fact.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 05:36 PM UTC
As a guy that watches porn, I really dislike the abusive type of porn this article mentions. I can't get off to that kind of shit.

This Japanese porn I came across kept having the woman in the film cry over everything happening to her ... people like this?

But we also need to ask how much abuse is actually happening - since some porn could simply be women acting as if they are being exploited/tortured/etc just so they can get that paycheck at the end of the day.

The movie Snuff depicted torture and brutal murder, I'm assuming this simply depicted, but did not involve such acts. But again, there have been movies that depict torture and brutal murder, and can also be viewed in a movie theatre in most major cities.

I feel the best thing anarchists can do on this issue is to promote sex worker unionization/organization to combat misogynistic and violent tendencies in the industry. *shrug* But I've thought this for sometime now, and I've read articles almost identical to this one before.

I'd prefer to read an article by someone who works in the industry instead of one which tries to marry ideology with a skewed view of reality.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 01:23 PM UTC
Some forms of pornography are sexist, obviously. But that does not descredit the whole concept of filming/photographing sexual acts. Don't anarchists have sex too? So what if we videotaped ourselves having non-oppressive mutually enjoyable sex? Would that be inherent anti-woman? I don't think so...there are possibilities for liberation in pornography, if its oppressive thats a fault of the producers.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 05:23 PM UTC
I almost quit reading this article at the line "stores selling sexy lingerie, so women can excite their male partners." Ha ha ha ha ha. So erotophobic, so hetero-centric. This author must have been reading some second-wave feminist crap and decided to resuscitate all the worst, most generalized arguments.

In my own personal experience, I have ALWAYS been way more into lingerie (aka dressing up) than any male partner, who generally can't wait to get the clothes OFF. I mean, I was wearing my ruffle-butt panties backwards at age 3. I love dressing up. And so do a lot of my female friends. Wearing lingerie (if you want to) is one of the most non-oppressive ways to express sexuality. I am sick and tired of feminists who claim that anything that happens to coincide with heterosexual male fantasies is just playing into the hands of the oppressor and being male-identified. Could it possibly occur to these folks that someone might ENJOY wearing silky underclothes? Nawwww. 'Course not. Purple matching bra and panty sets are oppressive.

The oh-too-simplistic condemnation of porn and sexuality in this article reeks of an ideology that condemns MEN for their sexuality. Especially funny/bad is the comment about how erotic literature is good, because you have to think, but porn is bad because its visual. Men are frequently way more into visual porn than women. I like reading all those naughty stories on nerve.com. My boyfriend likes checking out the pictures. Does that make either of us better or worse? This article is basically condemning everything that men like and praising everything that women like. (Of course, even those generalizations are pretty tired - there are many men and women who prefer both, backwards, forwards, etc)

The author also does a great disservice to readers as he/she completely ignores different genders (transgendered and transsexuals, intergendered, etc) and different sexual orientations. What about lesbian porn?, etc etc.

I feel like a lot of the anti-erotic ideas of feminism were really negative for me and my budding sexuality as a teenager - they fed perfectly into the societal shame confronting women about their sexuality. Every day, I am working to un brainwash myself from the crap my second-wave feminist mom, conservative pops, the media, my high school guyfriends, etc etc, shoved down my throat. It's time to move on past making people feel bad about their sexuality. Criticisms of violent porn - sure. But if close-ups of genitalia make you uncomfortable, perhaps you might want to reexamine your own sexuality. (and no - the close-up crotch shot is not necessarily what I get off on, but I'm not going to condemn men for liking it. That is a matter of taste, not domination.)

I hate to be so negative about an article about feminism, because I'd like to see more anarcha-feminist articles on Infoshop. New conceptions about sexuality, pornography and gender interactions need to be raised.

Now where are those ruffle-butt panties?
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 05:57 PM UTC

i think porn is like the internet. the internet is basically operational because iut was useful for War (and the state) and Business. yet, the internet has brought some people some freedom, though with some cost to others. so who matters more?

porn like Hollywood TV and Green Day punk also have educated many people and help break down a few tabboos. but it has a cost too---some people get exploited, and profits are made which in turn have mixed uses. MaYBE the porn industry can do something like endow a university or become some thing like the Rockefeller foundation, or put a museum on the mall in DC. you know, acknowledge some mistakes and pay up.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Gwen on Tuesday, March 15 2005 @ 08:35 PM UTC
I haven't seen any porn I've thought was positive or empowering, but I haven't look that hard. As noted above, capitalism plays a big part in the sex industry today, just as in every industry.

It's hard to find porn which is not demeaning of the sexuality of both genders, is not enforcing gender or race stereotypes, is produced honestly by 100% non-coerced people etc. It's hard to find food that isn't covered and soaked in chemicals or GMed, and is harvested, prepared and trasported by healthy, free, willing workers, contains no weird chemical additives, etc. Ditto with just about every other "consumer product" produced under capitalism. We can't use McDonald's as a judge of the value as food as a whole. Luckily we have traditional ideas about food which extend back much farther than this economy. New media such as video, and the internet though, as you mention, have been around for a pretty short amount of time; they are children of this economic and social order and have not had the chance to grow beyond this. Even printing and photography have only ever existed in the context of hirarchical oppressive societies as far as I am aware. So how can this be any judge of it's potential?

I support all libertarian (and some state/legal reforms although it can get *very* sticky) efforts to fight mysoginist programing/propaganda in communities by everybody and in the workplace by sex workers and their allies.

That said, I haven't seen any yet but if I ever do, I'd fully support the production and distribution of empowering porn. :)

---
--
More joy
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16 2005 @ 01:44 PM UTC
One of my biggest problems with most hetero porn is the lack of sexual education for young males seeking to get off in all the wrong ways. Sex in American/Eurocentric culture is not nearly as explored and understood as it is in other more ancient teachings like the Tao, and Kama Sutra. I'm definitely not against voyerism, but a lot of porn sex misinforms many young males about how to fully enjoy sex. Most of the male population in America averages about 15 min.(not to say quick can't be enjoyable), because of their inability to differenciate between orgasm and ejaculation. A good book for anyone to read on enjoying sex is "the Multi-orgasmic couple." Generally speaking I'm vehemently against the exploitation of sex workers, but I'm not against Pornograghy. Ultimately porn could do a lot of good if used for pleasure and education.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16 2005 @ 04:06 PM UTC
Pornography: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

(From Late Greek pornographos, writing about prostitutes)

Source: The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

Pornography: material that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement

Source: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.

This is the contemporary meaning of the word.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Compare to the following loaded definitions:

pornography : creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire

Source: WordNet 2.0, 2003 Princeton University

1. Licentious painting or literature; especially, the painting anciently employed to decorate the walls of rooms devoted to bacchanalian orgies.

Source: CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 16 2005 @ 04:29 PM UTC
It is an extreme disservice to the English language and the consensus of communication to redefiine a word to suite one's own narrow agenda. This is Humpty Dumpty speech:

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 17 2005 @ 08:03 AM UTC
Man fucks woman, subject verb object.

Speaking of language is probably more relevant than anything else said above.

The times that i have had extraordinary sex have been few and unspeakable thru any common vernacular. Tech gives us reification and takes us further from real life, allowing us lifestyles safe on our domesticated chains. Porn is undeniably another commodification of that which in a truly liberated society would be given and received freely. Technology is another partner in this crime of our modern existence, and porn on the internet is a release for the oppressed to further put down those who are on the bottom. Work at a job and take shit from your boss-your compensation is getting to go home and surveille others thru a webcam! No thank you, I want it all blown up on behalf of real freedom.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 14 2005 @ 02:58 PM UTC
I find myself in confusing wrangles in this discussion because of the placement of language and definitions. The post that began this discussion speaks of "porn" vs "eroticism," defending the latter because its multi-dimensional (i.e. emotional, intimite, erotic) and condemning the former because it's one-dimensional, showing only bodies sexually positioned to gratify the observer. In other words (according to the first post), "porn" is harmful because it's depersonalized sexual imagery. I think these definitions are overly simplified. I don't think Sexually explicit imagery is necessarilly degrading or harmful to anybody. Some is and some isn't. For instance, I don't think an erotic video of two men having sex exploits anybody (if you can think of how it does, please let me know). I also don't think S/M exploits anybody, because people who get into S/M do so because they enjoy it. On the other hand, a depiction of a woman "enjoying" rape, or a piece of child porn is extremely harmful. I think making blanket generalizatoins about sexually explicit imagery is lazy, and we should consider each situation on an individual basis. Also, I DO think that everybody is exploited by capitalism, and I'd like to keep sex and capitalism separate (Just like I'd like to keep movies, literature, art, and education all separate from capitalism). Also, as far as pornography and prostitution go, we should be primarily concerned about the human rights of the sex workers: is their work voluntary? If so, are they unionized? I also think that if someone WANTS to pose nude for a camera, they should be free to do so without judgement. This should not be conflated with people who are kidnapped or coerced into posing sexually.
Pornography: Liberation or Enslavement?
Authored by: JJ on Wednesday, June 29 2005 @ 08:21 AM UTC
I think porn sucks because it reinforces passive spectatorship...Nadia C. of Crimethinc. wrote a great piece on this that you can read here:
http://www.crimethinc.com/library/english/69.html

first two lines:

"Because we get to have so little honest, intimate, beautifully dangerous sex that they can sell us flat images of it instead. Because we spend so much more time contemplating these representations than having sex that when we do sleep together, it is more a meeting of roles than of individuals