Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth

Welcome to Infoshop News
Tuesday, February 09 2010 @ 08:37 PM UTC

School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment

CensorshipAURORA, Colo. - University of Colorado administrators Thursday took the first steps toward a possible dismissal of a professor who likened World Trade Center victims to a notorious Nazi. School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment

By CATHERINE TSAI, Associated Press Writer

AURORA, Colo. - University of Colorado administrators Thursday took the first steps toward a possible dismissal of a professor who likened World Trade Center victims to a notorious Nazi.

Interim Chancellor Phil DiStefano ordered a 30-day review of Ward Churchill's speeches and writings to determine if the professor overstepped his boundaries of academic freedom and whether that should be grounds for dismissal.

Also Thursday, the Board of Regents issued an apology for Churchill's remarks at a meeting and voted to support the university's review of Churchill.

The raucous meeting drew dozens of protesters who back Churchill; at least two were arrested for disrupting the meeting and another was led away in handcuffs.

The regents refused to take public comment at their meeting, prompting an outcry from some of the 35 students who carried signs reading, "Protect academic freedom" and "Witch hunt." About a dozen professors also attended.

"I wish the regents had agreed to take some public comments," said law professor Barbara Bintliff, chairwoman of the Boulder Faculty Assembly. "Discussion and debate is what a university is all about."

Gov. Bill Owens issued a written statement saying he deplored the behavior of some of the students at the meeting, and that their behavior underscored the "culture of violence" that can be spawned by essays such as Churchill's.

Owens has called for Churchill's firing.

The furor erupted last month after Churchill was invited to speak at Hamilton College in upstate New York. Campus officials discovered an essay and follow-up book by Churchill in which he said the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were a response to a history of American abuses abroad, particularly against indigenous peoples.

Among other things, he said those killed in the trade center were "little Eichmanns," a reference to Adolf Eichmann, who organized Nazi plans to exterminate Jews. The college canceled Churchill's appearance, citing death threats and concerns about security.

University officials have previously condemned Churchill's comments but defended his right to express them. University President Elizabeth Hoffman declined to comment Thursday on Churchill's future.

Churchill, whose pickup truck was vandalized with swastikas in front of his Boulder home sometime late Tuesday, has promised to sue the school if he is removed.

Earlier Thursday, the state Senate passed a resolution denouncing Churchill's comments as "evil and inflammatory." The nonbinding resolution was identical to one passed Wednesday by the House.

Democratic state Sen. Peter Groff cast the lone "no" vote, saying he disagreed with Churchill but that the resolution provides him with undeserved attention and attacks free speech.

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20050203212058919

No trackback comments for this entry.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment | 10 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 03 2005 @ 10:54 PM UTC
that's pretty amazing that a government can officially call something "evil". what does that mean?
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 01:22 AM UTC
" he said the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were a response to a history of American abuses abroad, particularly against indigenous peoples."

That's exactly correct!
If not, that is what it shoold have been.

US Freedom is not freedom to ravage your neighbor.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 08:14 AM UTC
it probably means that the truth is evil. anything that fails to jive with the new " agenda" is evil.
churchill is evil because
Authored by: AgentOrangeCrush on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 08:50 PM UTC
it's cause churchill's one of those killers who goes around killing, and that's the reason for there being misery in the world. Also, that means he's an evil-doer and most likely hates freedom...and since the accepted definition of terrorist these days is one who commits evil deeds, he's probably that too.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, February 06 2005 @ 12:58 PM UTC
Are there any moral absolutes? Is murder wrong? Is gutting a woman
with a child in her womb with a rusty knife -- is that wrong?

If there are things that are wrong -- that are evil -- than why can a
government not stand up and say "this is wrong"?

Remember, democratic government exists at the will of the people
and is run by imperfect people. Sometimes the government is wrong,
and sometimes the government itself does evil things. But in a
democracy, we can vote out people that do wrong things. Perhaps
officially denouncing something as evil is itself wrong. Well, you have
a chance to affect that.

On the other hand, perhaps the people who voted for that resolution
were themselves exercising their free speech as public employees --
just as Mr. Churchill did. We can't have it both ways!
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 03:31 AM UTC
This whole thing is absolutely awful. Is there interest among the US (or local) anarchist to somehow organize around this issue?

It feels horrible to just sit around and do nothing, but living on another part of the world we can't propably do nothing but give our full support and solidarity to Ward Churchill, his close ones and everyone working on this issue!
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 06:28 AM UTC
His reference to the folk in the WTC as "little Eichmanns" was not about them being Nazis, but about them being complacent cogs in the wheel. Eichmann was never accused of actually killing a single person, yet was tried for genocide becuase he masterminded "the final solution." Very few of those corporate execs in there had actually killed anyone, but they absolutely aided in murder.

I value their lives that were lost, but not above the lives that they helped take. If you engage in activities that kill people, you have to expect retaliation.

Josh

School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 07:37 PM UTC
Not to mention that reporters keep leaving out that Churchill wasn't referring to everyone who died as "little Eichmann's", just those who are the technicians (is that the right word?) of the injustice being fought against. He's not referring to the firefighters who died, nor the janitors.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, February 07 2005 @ 12:56 PM UTC
i certainly hope that they do fire him. he deserves it.
School May Fire Professor for 9/11 Comment
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, February 04 2005 @ 10:58 AM UTC
I really wish I was in Colorado right now.