"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:35 PM CDT

Melbourne: Anarchist Bikes Choke Tunnel

News ArchiveSubmitted by Reverend Chuck0:

ABOUT 500 cycling activists disrupted city traffic last
night when they took over the Burnley Tunnel. Peak-hour
traffic backed up for several blocks when the eastbound
tunnel was closed for 45 minutes from 6.30pm.

The cyclists were protesting against a lack of government
funding for bicycle safety and awareness.

Police said the protest caused only a minor disruption and
they were happy with the conduct of the protesters and, in
particular, with the reaction of inconvenienced motorists.

The cyclists, led by protest group Critical Mass, cheered,
whistled and lifted their bikes to the air triumphantly
after pedalling up the steep hill at the end of the tunnel.

The ragtag group included the young and old, dogs in sleds
and men driving aero-dynamic velo-mobiles.

Activist Greg Dickson, 28, said the protesters fell into two
groups -- environmentalists and bicycle safety advocates.
The architect said he took part because he had been injured
several times while commuting to and from work.

"We really need bike lanes on major roads," he said. "Many
people don't realise how dangerous our roads are for
cyclists. I've had three or four bad accidents when
motorists cut in front of me."

The protest began when cyclists assembled outside the State
Library about 5.30pm, some in lycra cycling wear, the more
alternative with dreadlocks, middle-aged couples riding
together and even some in costume.

Several had stereos attached to the backs of their bikes,
one blaring out Beatles classics as they travelled down
Swanston St.

Simon Stainey addressed the crowd before they set off.

"We are happy to be exercising and happy to be making our
way to work and study on bicycles," said Mr Stainey.

He was quick to point out he was not an event organiser, as
Critical Mass is an anarchist movement -- an "un-organised
coincidence" rather than an organisation, according to some
websites.

Many of those riding, like Graham McGilvray, were first-time
Critical Mass attendees.

"We are here to get as many cars out of the city as
possible, and to highlight the need for more bike paths," Mr
Gilvray said. He would like to see a bike path along the
whole of CityLink and over the Westgate Bridge.

This report appears on news.com.au.

-- Dan Clore *******

*******

********

****** The A-Infos News Service ******

News about and of interest to anarchists

******

COMMANDS: lists@ainfos.ca

REPLIES: a-infos-d@ainfos.ca

HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca

WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/

INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org


-To receive a-infos in one language only mail lists@ainfos.ca the message:

unsubscribe a-infos

subscribe a-infos-X

where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)

Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Melbourne: Anarchist Bikes Choke Tunnel | 17 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by Dan
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 11:26 AM CDT
I find it very annoying that A-Infos re-sends messages from my Smygo list, complete with my name, but cuts my sigfile and the URL of the Smygo list.

But here it is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
comment by Kate James
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 03:10 PM CDT
Phoenix just kicked off our bike weekend on Saturday, June 27th, with a critical mass and a party. If you don\'t know about it yet, check out http://criticalmassphx.tripod.com !
comment by raindog
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 04:38 PM CDT
\"The cyclists were protesting against a lack of government funding\"

ummm...anarchists?
comment by pr
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 07:38 PM CDT
Anarchist bikes!
I\'m sure out of the 500 or so there were some anarchists.(Still not sure about the bikes though.)
A local repukelian decribed \'anarchic\' protestors who,he said,were being organized by some S-11 or M1 group.Right wing conspiracy theory as per usual.
Both the police and the state govt reaffirmed the right to protest and more rightwing media types seemed upset than actual motorists.I hope this is a regular event now as contestation of the urban space heats up all over.
comment by pr again
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 07:43 PM CDT
Melbourne IMC has a center column article that links to several articles of mine re the Bali \'Warningate.\'
Proof that I don\'t just hang around here all day annoying Flint and the red Borg that infest us.
comment by tight A
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 28 2003 @ 07:45 PM CDT


Politics is about winning people over to your side. It sounds like you pissed off a bunch of motorists.
comment by Bike Lanes Suck!
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 29 2003 @ 12:25 AM CDT
Who are these clowns asking for bike lanes in their city streets? It is now WELL KNOWN that bike lanes are a major hazard to bicyclist saftey and that all they do is give motorists an excuse to push us off roads. CM should be about RECLAIMING THE STREETS not about supporting some bunch of wonks that want to have a bike lane so that they can delude themselves that they\'re safe and make competent vehicular cyclists look like they\'re breaking the law.

NO FUCKING BIKE LANES!
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 29 2003 @ 01:54 AM CDT
Yeah! What\'s up with the wonks asking for the fucking bike lanes? I remember when I participated in CM in Madison about ten years ago the local organizers did an excellent job of organizing anonymously without making CM a protest ride for something specific. Then some liberal fucker came along and started speaking for everybody, saying that the CM was being done for some fucking bike lanes. CM is about bikes BEING TRAFFIC, not reinforcing the idea that biking should be treated differently.

Yep, as you say, bike lanes are bad for biking, for many reasons, including the fact that they give cyclists a false sense of security. We need more bikes in traffic, not in some liberal ass bike lanes.
comment by Sven
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 29 2003 @ 03:49 AM CDT
... Ever been in Copenhagen, Chuck?

BTW, in Denmark, there\'s been bike lanes from (I think) at least the 1950s and onward - and they work quite well indeed (also with people \"colourfully\" swearing at you if you \"invade\" their lane as a pedestrian :-) ).

OK... I\'m partially joking, of course - but what is the real alternative, right now? Bike lanes are, IMO, a quite good thing, at least as an interim measure, waiting for car traffic to - more or less spontaneously - diminish: the ideal solution, maybe, could be to \"liberate\" the streets from cars in favor of rapid transit tramways (remember...? - those that GM & Co. \"deliberately\" removed many decades ago, in the US!); and bicycle and pedestrian lanes would only be the natural complement to such a situation - not being that much practical and secure to mix trams and bicycles/pedestrians (well, it\'s a common practice, for example in the Netherlands - but not optimal, anywway).

As previously said (instead of ranting in a rather nihilist way), maybe it would be better to actively support - as far as possible, of course - (especially for all you in the US) some of the at least acceptably pseudo-anarchist organisms such as http://www.newurbanism.org ...? That could be a quite good beginning - of course, waiting for more radical alternatives... :-)
comment by urbanbicyclist
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 29 2003 @ 06:20 PM CDT
Hey peoples, From Melbourne here...


The news report above was from the CORPORATE MEDIA. Critical Mass is as you would expect it, and we dont hire pr consultants or do press releases. We were not protesting anything other than whatever individual decides to tell whichever reporter sticks a tape recorder under their nose. So I\'m sure people at any Critical Mass would like more bike lanes, or less freeways, or no freeway at all.

As for mister john forrester mysognistic vehicluarist no bikes lanes. yeah whatever.

Some non corporate media facts.

There were 450 people on the ride.

dis-organisers expected 300-ish.

Melbourne Critical Mass must also credit to the San Francisco 10th Birthday Celebrations CREW and the Chicago Bikes Are FUN crew for suitable effected inspiration.
comment by Big Red Fat Cat
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 29 2003 @ 10:40 PM CDT
The Melbourne June rides are usually small, quiet & cold. We normally get 40-50 cyclists/skaters. To get almost 400-500 is overwhelming. If one is more concerned public relations, corporate spin, sucking up to media whores and pissing off motorists, please, someone remind the poor little dears in their coccooned smogboxes, that they have virtually similar events to \"Critical Mass\" that occur on a twice daily basis, five days a week. Except ours are sooooo much more fun.
comment by smash car culture!
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 30 2003 @ 12:41 PM CDT
We need more bikes on roads and the abolition of subsidies for cars (fellow wonks and bean-counters, take note, local roads are paid for by your regressive sales taxes). Real anarchists take note, the monoculture of automobile transport is very delicate and easily temporarily broken, and in fact breaks itself. It\'s just fun to be responsible.
comment by Spartacus
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 01 2003 @ 02:48 AM CDT
Follies of the near-clueless corporate media were ripe for the picking around last month\'s Tunnel Ride. According to some bright reporter, numbers failed to meet expectations... er, right... and those expectations must have been really well researched - because, of course, they get paid to do this stuff - average attendance for June is below 100 riders.
Another corporate journalist showed clear brilliance for providing enough rope to hang their own mathematically inept neck, like this one: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/27/1056683906293.html
Riders\' campaign goes underground
June 28 2003
By Chris Evans

A protest on bicycles forced the Burnley Tunnel to close at peak-hour last
night. Under police supervision up to 500 cyclists turned up, although
hundreds, possibly thousands, had been expected for the tunnel ride. ...[END]

Last time I checked, 500 WAS in the hundreds... let me check again... yep, 500 still classifies as being in the hundreds.

And, as for the whole \'protest\' angle, it seems the media can just never miss an opportunity to muddy the waters of democratic freedom by proclaiming it to be an act of protest:

http://heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,6666555%255E24218,00.html

Police debacle on CityLink
28jun03

THE decision of senior police to allow a cyclists\' protest to block
CityLink at peak hour shows a horribly confused view of democratic rights. (AND CORPORATE MEDIA SPIN)

A police escort was provided so cyclists from a fringe activist group had
CityLink to themselves, causing traffic chaos at the busiest time of the
week. The protest group, Critical Mass, has a right to express its
anti-traffic view, however anarchic.
But there are plenty of parks, bike tracks and city public spaces where
protesters can do it without disrupting a vast number of citizens. Less
busy times, too. [END]

Oh, silly protestors, don\'t you know the people are busy destroying the world; can\'t you be civil and protest the destruction elsewhere; where we can\'t hear, see, or feel you?

And even more telling, IT\'S NOT A PROTEST(!); it\'s just a growing community of cyclist riding their bikes together; on the road; during a busy period of the day; singing, laughing, shouting, stopping and defying logic by lifting their bikes in the air. I mean, how dare they organise(disorganise) themselves? It\'s just too democratic!

All the cyclists did was choose to ride their bikes together through a tunnel. The media, the police, the government, the motorists and the private toll collector did the rest. None of the cyclists asked for the tunnel to be closed for them; none asked for the police to be in attendance; none asked for all the really cool, free publicity...

As for the legitimacy of disrupting the \'status quo\' however intentional, or unintentional, even a simple examination of the effects of cycling versus driving big metal cages that burn up fossil fuel, chew up urban and agricultural land, lead to the ill health of the environment, pedestrians and just about everyone else will yied some interesting, if scary, insights.

Time to face the facts: the human race is speeding at ever greater speed towards imminent destruction; or, for the faint-hearted or just plain self-centred, it\'s time to hide from reality and hope it just goes away - much like most of the respondants of \'drive-time\' radio.
comment by Bike Lanes Suck!
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 01 2003 @ 04:12 PM CDT
Hey Urbanbicyclist whats with calling Forrester a misogynist? Do you have any evidence for that or is it just a weird sort of smear? Even if its true that hes weird about women does that mean that all the research that he and the League of American Bicyclists do about bicycling is wrong?

Ask for bike lanes and you\'ll get pushed off the street into little bike ghettos. Forrester and a lot of other people now have documented the increased accident rates associated with bike lanes.

Like I said before: they SUCK! and I mentioned Forrester to try and back it up. If you have good arguemtns agains that then make them, but don\'t just come out with crap about Forrester.
comment by Bike Lanes Suck!
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 01 2003 @ 04:15 PM CDT
There are a lot of incompetent assholes that want a niche for themselves in \"bike activism\" where they get paid by local councils to devise ways to get bicyclists out of the way of cars: commonly they call these \"bike lanes\". There\'s a weird set of articles and comments about this at http://www.cicle.org/info/viewtopic.php?t=6
comment by Bike Lanes Suck!
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 01 2003 @ 04:25 PM CDT
Sven,
the immediate alternative is to get out on the streets on your bike and ride it like the vehicle that it is. Encourage your friends, family to do the same. Bike lanes are actually shown to increase the accident rate for cyclists in many situations. There\'s a good discussion about it here http://www.cicle.org/info/viewtopic.php?t=6 which uses data from the UK, Ireland and Holland to prove the point.

Among other things it claims that bike lanes were designed in the 20\'s to GET BICYCLES OFF THE ROAD so that cars could go faster!

What we need (IMHO) is more people on bikes insisting on their right to use the road in the manner prescribed by law. Bike lanes = car doors in the face, rocks and glass on the unswept surface, dangerous intersections. More importantly it creates and reinforces the erroneous perception that bicycles shouldn\'t be in traffic and treated as regular vehicles.

Bicyclsist are often their own worse enemies, especially when they get jobs with the government about the \"bike problem\"!
comment by Yvgrvny
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 21 2003 @ 01:56 PM CDT
>>Who are these clowns asking for bike lanes in their city streets? It is now WELL KNOWN that bike lanes are a major hazard to bicyclist saftey and that all they do is give motorists an excuse to push us off roads.<<

Duh... this was \'reported\' in the corporate press.
Maybe one \'representative\' was interviewed - of course in the simplified news grab that one person speaks for all (not).
Actually Melbourne is pretty good for cycling and has plenty of great bike lanes - even on main roads.