"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:33 PM CDT

Atlanta's hopes for FTAA are in doubt

News ArchiveSubmitted by Circuit:

The Free Trade Area of the Americas, a holy grail for Atlanta on par with the 1996 Olympics, faces serious challenges and may not materialize by the 2005 deadline U.S. and Atlanta officials are counting on, a government report says.

Atlanta wants to be the headquarters of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), a trade zone stretching from Canada to Argentina. Landing the home office would bring more than 11,000 jobs to the area with an annual economic impact of $500 million.

But 20 months before the compact's deadline, an April report by the federal General Accounting Office raises questions about when or if the FTAA will be signed, which casts doubt on Atlanta's hopes to be its headquarters.

According to the report, the 34 nations involved are at odds over eliminating tariffs and halting subsidies to farmers. Key members, like Brazil, are having second thoughts. And the U.S. organizing team has only two staffers and limited funding.

In addition, a critical FTAA meeting this November in Miami is shaping up to be a disaster on par with the 1999 World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle, where protesters assaulted delegates and caused $3 million in property damage, the report said.

However, Atlanta organizers are unfazed, and have no indication from the U.S. Trade Representative in Washington that delays are ahead, said Gordon Giffin, a director of Hemisphere Inc., the nonprofit behind Atlanta's FTAA effort.

"We have a nine-inning game in mind," said Giffin, the former U.S. ambassador to Canada and a partner at McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP. "We may have to readjust for extra innings ... but I think FTAA will get done."

Gov. Sonny Perdue and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin formed Hemisphere, headed by Equifax Inc. CEO Tom Chapman, to win the FTAA's headquarters, or "secretariat," from Miami and other rivals. Organizers have raised $2 million.

Andrew Young, the former Atlanta mayor and United Nations ambassador, has agreed to be an adviser to Atlanta's effort, said Carlos Martel, deputy commissioner for international trade for the Georgia Department of Industry, Trade and Tourism.

U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, head of the Senate Finance Committee, asked for the GAO report and held May 13 hearings on the trade federation, citing his concerns about its future.

Warning signs
The report and subsequent testimony warned that the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, which is heading the U.S. effort, is "stretched thin," which risks a "slowdown" in FTAA's progress.

Another problem is Brazil, which, along with the United States, is co-chairing the FTAA project. Brazil's "participation ... has slowed down," and its government has "appeared reticent to decisively embrace an FTAA," the report said.

Brazil's new president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, said before his October election, "As it is being proposed by the United States, the FTAA is not an integration proposal, it is annexation politics, and our country won't be enclosed," the GAO said.

Even worse for FTAA's timetable, much of the 400-page preliminary agreement pact "remains in brackets," meaning it has yet to be argued or decided.

"[Negotiators have] made limited progress in resolving substantive differences in the agreement's text ... to improve market access," the report said.

Subsidies and reducing tariffs are key sticking points, and related talks on trade barriers at the WTO have "bogged down," which could "ultimately imperil [FTAA's] conclusion by January 2005," the report said.

A WTO meeting in September may decide whether FTAA is wrapped up by 2005, the report said.

Given the challenges, Brazil's foreign minister has said 2005 may be "too ambitious" a deadline, the GAO found.

Local officials were less pessimistic. "If everyone begins to be concerned and replicates doubt, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy," Martel said. "But if we focus on our commitment, there's a really good chance it will happen on schedule."

Miami faces challenge
Still, hurdles remain, chief among them the November FTAA ministerial gathering in Miami, the GAO said.

Miami organizers and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative have limited funds to host the meeting of 5,000 delegates this fall, which the GAO estimates will cost $10 million. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative budgeted $200,000 for the event.

Miami also does not have a security plan in place for an anticipated 20,000 to 100,000 protesters, the report said.

"The concern is that Miami is not ready for November," said Terry McCoy, director of the Latin American Business Environment Program at the University of Florida.

"It's a major undertaking, and I've seen what can go wrong ... the worst-case scenario being Seattle," said McCoy, who is also an adviser to Florida FTAA, the nonprofit group competing with Atlanta for the FTAA headquarters.

The last FTAA meeting in Quito, Ecuador, attended by Franklin and other Atlanta business leaders, had "chaotic" presentations disrupted by protesters. One person was killed during an anti-FTAA demonstration, the GAO said.

Success both in Miami and for the FTAA in general will require "intense preparations on the part of both the [U.S. government] and the Miami organizers between now and November," the GAO concluded. Despite four years of talks, "considerable work remains."

Reach Woods at wwoods@bizjournals.com
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Atlanta's hopes for FTAA are in doubt | 6 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by smash
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 03 2003 @ 05:35 PM CDT
wow, it would be really great if we could shut down the meetings decisively. Im not sure that it would necesarily stop the ftaa but it certainly could turn public opinion. I don\'t care if i have to hitchike all the way from wisconsin, ill be in miami come november
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 03 2003 @ 06:14 PM CDT
i live fairly close to miami and initially wasn\'t too excited about the protest itself (or any other protests in the us at the moment), but hopefully the recent activities in switzerland and france can inspire new energy.

we really haven\'t had a large protest in the south east, so it\'ll be interesting to see how we handle this as opposed to those in dc, the north east or west coast.

miami also is not accustomed to protests with so many people, unlike dc and new york, so hopefully they will not be as successful in controlling us.

we\'ll see.
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 04 2003 @ 12:56 AM CDT
It\'ll be fun. :)
comment by Mark Bialkowski
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 03 2003 @ 09:56 PM CDT
Remember how the momentum against capitalist globalization grew between 1997 and 2001? Every meeting of capitalists and their paid representatives of the state saw ever-larger, diverse opposition in the streets that they could only oppose with massive, brutal force.

I get a sense that the momentum is building again, after the massive diversion that Sept. 11, and the ensuing antiwar movements, created. Anticapitalist and self-determination organizing drowned in a sea of antiwar mudslinging that ultimately went nowhere. Despite the good intentions and utter imbecility of the prowar arguments, the people with complete control over the military and the state had their minds made up long before Saddam replaced Osama in the news. What we were doing was the equivalent of the villagers telling the avalanche, \"please stop, you\'ll get us all killed.\" It was great to shout our opposition to the world, but the war machine does not rely on our acceptance to operate. The individuals who have their fingers on the button will only listen to the dissenters long enough to make sure they can wage war with no effect on their own power.

Now, we have some of the capitalist world\'s rulers making nice in a resort city, trying to look good for the cameras, while people from across a continent gather to let them know that the fight against capitalist hegemony is not forgotten. Since the survival of any hierarchy--be it Stalinist, capitalist, or monarchist--depends on the acquiescence and acceptance of the very people being controlled, this is a battle we actually have a chance of winning. With war machines, the only structure that matters is the military chain of command. We are outsiders, as far as emperors and commanders-in-chief are concerned. With social hierarchies, we are as inside as everyone else, which gives us a real chance to influence the structure, and hopefully bring it down.

A long, hot summer, and a hotter fall is coming. Montreal, then Cancun, then Miami--not to mention the social forums, indigenous encounters, and other actions building around the world.

In the face of creeping capitalist and hegemonic control, I get the feeling the rest of us are about to say, with a bullhorn and a raised fist, that we aren\'t back, we never went away.
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 03 2003 @ 11:05 PM CDT
I see the momentum building again, but I think the playing field has changed so much that the pressure is really off of us this time around. It\'s become much easier to respond to the journalist question: \"Is your movement dying out?\"

For one thing, the U.S. decision to pursue a unilateral imperial strategy around the world has undone many of the so-called \"free trade\" schemes that relied on a globalziation of (theoretically) equal player involved in the game. The U.S. has been the big proponent of neoliberalism and free trade. The rest of the world hates the U.S. now for other reasons, but they also see the hypocrisy involved in free trade and the disaster of neoliberalism.

Another significant new factor on the playing field is Enron, the dot-com bust, the stagnant stock market, the huge US budget deficit, and all the economic factors that have worsened and become more obvious to average Americans. This means that working people distrust corporations more than ever and are skeptical about anything the US government says about economics. More or less, we have an easier job these days of talking to Americans about our issues.

There are many other smaller factors on the new playing field that play in our favor. One is that we have a highly organized, decentralized global network of anti-capitalists. Many in our ranks are disillusioned after the war, but we all saw how much the tide turned against the war in the United States. There really are LOTS of us. Finally, it should be pointed out the increasing number of economists, development experts, and former World Bank/IMF officials who are speaking out in dissent. That book from Joseph Stiglitz is still on the bestseller list.

So, I\'d say that the pressure is off, so let\'s have some fun!
comment by Durruti's Column
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 04 2003 @ 08:09 AM CDT
Miami also does not have a security plan in place for an anticipated 20,000 to 100,000 protesters, the report said.

Hmmmm.... This could either be really good or really bad...