"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:35 PM CDT

Washington, DC: Riding A Bike Is Not A Crime

News ArchiveSubmitted by Reverend Chuck0:

Riding A Bike Is Not A Crime

by Miles Swanson

2:45am Tue Apr 8 '03
miles@swanson.com

DC CODE § 50-1601 states:

"The Council of the District of Columbia finds that:
(1) Increased use of bicycles for transportation
and recreation will result in improved air quality,
reduced levels of noise and traffic congestion,
greater energy conservation, lower transportation costs,
fewer parking problems, and increased physical fitness."

It seems that the Chief Ramsey does not agree with
the findings of the DC City Council. Early Monday evening,
police, perhaps taking a cue from their Oakland brethren,
continued their policy of what seems to be an ever
increasing use of verbal harassment, physical force,and
carefully calculated tactics exercised to disrupt and
deny Critical Mass riders of their right to peacefully
and lawfully ride on the streets of Washington, DC.
The culmination of these unjust actions was the
illegal search of riders’ bags, the confiscation
and damage to riders' bikes, and the unlawful
arrest of one rider under the guise of assaulting
a police officer.

From the outset of the Monday’s ride,
bicyclers tried to obey police orders by keeping
to the right and in one lane, obeying traffic
signals and making the proper turning gestures.
Riders were consistently prevented from doing
so by police officers who took every opportunity to verbally harass individuals and assault riders,
using their motorcycles to broadside moving
bicyclers. Police drove their motorcycles
ahead of bicyclers and then suddenly stopped,
throwing riders off balance and in some cases
off their bikes entirely. In one instance, a
police officer on a motorcycle forced a moving
bicycler into the path of a parked car, leaving
the rider little time to avoid a serious accident.
Often, police would let some riders through a light,
only to stop the rest leaving the group splintered
and disrupted. Some officers even took it upon
themselves to single certain bicyclers out by
isolating them and then preventing them from
joining the rest of the riders.

Although not having your bike registered
is prohibited by DC Code, it is hardly ever enforced.
Police officers used this as pretext to rip riders
from their bikes in order to check for proper
compliance. The end result was one rider’s
bike taken from her while police made derogatory
and misogynistic comments and another rider being
assaulted by several officers, thrown to the ground,
and then put in handcuffs. He was charged with
assaulting a police officer and every witness can
attest that he did nothing to justify such action.

From now on bicyclists and especially
Critical Mass riders should keep their bikes
registered to avoidharassment by the police
and prevent the confiscation of your bicycle.
It takes one minute and one dollar at most
any police station or fire station. Riders
should also write and complain to city council
members and the DC Bicycle Advisory Council, http://ddot.dc.gov/information/bicycle/bicycle_program_bac.shtm). As well, riders should familiarize
themselves with relevant DC Code ://ddot.dc.gov/information/bicycle/bicycle_regulations.shtm) to prevent future police abuse. For example,
helmet laws only apply to those 16 years or younger,
it is ok to ride safely on the sidewalk in the
majority of DC unless posted otherwise, and,
whether the police like it or not, OPERATORS OF BICYCLES HAVE THE SAME RIGHT AS OPERATORS OF MOTOR VEHICLES (DC Bicycle Regulations § 1200.3).

Miles Swanson

National Lawyers Guild

www.civil-rights.net

www.nlg.org

http://dc.indy
media.org/front.php3?article_id=63100&group=webcast
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Washington, DC: Riding A Bike Is Not A Crime | 15 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by Circuit
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 02:10 PM CDT
Not a fascist state. Police state, yes, increasingly so. But not fascist.

The final element that marks movement towards fascism is not in place, and that is an organized street-level movement that uses violence to aid the state, but is simultaneously independant of the state.

To put it simply, as a dissident or revolutionary, in a police state, you worry about the police arresting you. In a fascist state, you worry about your neighbor killing you.

Circuit
comment by Reverend Chuck0
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 02:36 PM CDT
I\'ve been very reluctant to refer to the US as a fascist state, but given that so many on the left are using this label, I think the evidence is all there.

You suggest that we have yet to witness street level violence that is the hallmark of fascism. How about all of the racist violence that is being perpetrated by Americans against Americans who look like they came from the Middle East? What about all the racism and threats of violence on TV, radio, newspapers, and websites?

Worried about your neighbor killing you? Maybe not here in Arlington, but I\'ve read about activists in small town America who have been threatened. How many anti-war folks are in the closet right now because they are afraid to dissent in a time of \"support our troops?\" I also think that you can have a fascist state that isn\'t supported by the general population. Perhaps we just live in a police state run by a dictator.

comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 04:10 PM CDT
But it\'s not a mass movement like it was in Italy or Germany. These are relatively isolated incidents, and aren\'t anywhere near the scale of those which were perpetrated by the brownshirts.
comment by pr0t3s7
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 04:48 PM CDT
this sounds like something that I read on http://baltimore.indymedia.org ... the critical mass ride there was also assaulted by overzealous police officers
comment by donald
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 05:33 PM CDT
Wake the fuck up.

America is not a fascist state. That is an insult to those people around the world that do live under REAL fascist states.

Have we lost a lot of freedoms? yes. Is this any worse than the madness that happened in the Cold War? no.

As Anarchists, we\'re against all states, whether fascists or not. The word fascist loses meaning when you use it in this context.
comment by a sim
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 06:26 PM CDT
imo i think people should be reluctant to refer to the current US regime as fascist. obviously there are elements. maybe proto-fascist if one wants to stretch the point. Circuit makes a good point.

but so does Chuck0. in iowa city peace activists are receiving threatening phone calls, being pelted with eggs and rotten tomatoes.. etc etc. and in the same county a Muslim group trying to build a summer camp for youth is being accused of plotting to establish a terrorist training camp. but officially being denied on the basis of an imaginary \"environmental impact assessment\".

but the reason I am reluctant is clearly these and many other things are going on. but not necessarily in a comprehensive organized manner. what ever actions are going on don\'t even meet historical precedents with in the US context for fascism. say of the 1920\'s and 30s when there were well organized and national pro-fascist groups. namely the KKK among others.

another point is the Reichstag isn\'t burning, so to speak. the event that would clearly mark a suspension of liberal democratic systems, civil rights and the enforcement of marshal law has not taken place. not to say there has to be a defining moment where this occurs. just as plausible is a slow, gradual process. which I think is going on. most clearly evidenced by the formation of an extra judicial system to deal with \"terrorists\". and the patriot act. etc etc.

for me a defining moment may very well be the 2004 presidential elections. at that point I think it will be clearer how legitimate fears over fascism in the US are. from what I see there seems to be a faction, that is still very small but politically powerful, with in the republican party that does represent a sort of American fascism.

but either way all this highlights the blurry line between liberalism and fascism. and that they can exist with in the same state at the same time.

one last point would be this. that continually calling the US fascist or bushjr a fascist I think is problematic from the stand point of people that suffer under the rule of states that are clearly fascist. anarchist in the US shouldn\'t whine and claim victim hood when there is still a significant level of freedom to engage in dissident acts. we need to take full advantage of whatever freedoms we currently enjoy to create strong dissident movements.

fascism is a comprehensive and totalizing ordering of the state and society. an ordering that simply doesn\'t exist in the US at present. there are a million things we can point to as evidence that the liberal ordering of society is being slowly transformed. but maybe in describing this other words and terminology should be used. I\'m not suggesting anarchist don\'t raise alarm. in the end my point is simply this. I\'m uncomfortable calling the US fascist. because I simply don\'t believe it\'s true.
comment by scumbag
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 06:41 PM CDT
to a sim: lots of good points. It can be counterproductive to be too over-the-top in our rhetoric because it can turn off would-be allies.

The real battle in the US is to win over the liberals and middle-of-the-road folk who are scared of \"extremes\" but who also are starting to really feel that their world is changing and their lives are being affected. These folks come from all walks of life and are working class as well as middle class. Indeed, it may be work class folks who are scraping by check-to-check who are most skittish about \"extreme\" language, but who really understand the kind of oppression that is going on.

The battle for these minds shouldn\'t involve compromising principles, or advocating statism, but if watching your language a bit will help, why not?
comment by enemy combatant
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 07:19 PM CDT
first and foremost we all need to agree on the definition of \"fascist state\" before we can decide whether or not the US or any other nation fits the definition. we can\'t just blurt \"Yes it is!\" \"No it isn\'t!\" all day and night.
comment by enemy combatant
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 07:22 PM CDT
the dictionary defines \"fascism\" as:

A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

now, does the US fit this definition or not? does it have to completely fit, or is a partial fit sufficient? for example, we clearly have centralization of authority (but technically no dictator, not until Bush declares himself \'president for life\' or suspends the 2004 elections for \'security reasons\'). there are certainly socioeconomic controls in place. oppositions is DEFINITELY being suppressed through terror (state and private) and censorship. and there is definitely a policy of belligerent nationalism going on, isn\'t there?

so how about it?
comment by inscend
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 07:37 PM CDT
Has there ever been a nation wide critical mass attempted....people begin biking towards a city (NYC, Pittsburgh, LA, pick one) and gather people from all over the country descending on one city with their bikes! A summer project?
comment by @
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 07:57 PM CDT
Here in Bellingham a person called the local police and newspaper to inform them that they would shoot a male and female protester on the day of the student walkout(Friday the 4th). As for people not saying that we (american citizens) are not oppressed are under a fascist state because others are MORE oppressed or living under a worse fascist state is nonsense. If a woman is hit by her husband once, is it insulting to a woman who is beaten regularly to claim to be abused? Oppression should be identified and fought against no matter how little it is. If all countries outside of the US were anarchist utopias, and americans felt the current level of oppression, should we shut up about it, or fight it?
comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 11:39 PM CDT
Please, the US is not a fascist state. Iraq, yes. North Korea? Commie Fascism? is there a difference. We have liberal democracy here...free elections heavily influence by money. the right to protest, while some are spied on or relatively few cases of denial of such rights. For those who believe and say we live in a fascist state and are against it, probably would not be able to say that on this site...for it would be shut down, and they would be in prison.
comment by NOYMFB
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 08 2003 @ 11:50 PM CDT
I have to agree with the comments made about going to extremes when describing the United States. Look at countries like China and other countries in the Middle East. They do not allow ANY protests and the protests they do allow are state sponsored. We can still take the streets (after jumping through all the hoops) even if we are herded like cattle.

I would also like to comment that I think it is a bad idea to refer to Bush as Hitler or Republicans as Nazis. Yes Bush is a bad guy and Republicans as a whole are rather nasty. HOWEVER, Bush has yet to round up millions of anarchists, communists, jews, gypsys and gays and work them to death or execute them in gas chambers. I think it does a disservice to those who suffered under the yoke of Nazis terror to label every two-bit psychopath a Hitler or Nazis...whether it is George Bush or Saddam Hussein.



comment by Matt H
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 09 2003 @ 12:18 AM CDT
\"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power.\" - Benito Mussolini

Do I think the US is a full blown fascist state? No. I\'m participating in a public anarchist thread here, right? But I do think all the elements are right there for it to happen. It\'s not inconceiveable, especially with the climate these days.

Back on topic: Kudos to all Critical Mass and cyclists everywhere! I\'m riding my bike whenever I can.



comment by
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 09 2003 @ 04:05 AM CDT
Dictionaries are authoritarian. They are not the harbinger of objective truth.