"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."

Welcome to Infoshop News
Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 03:13 AM CDT

Sisters in the Struggle

News ArchiveSubmitted by Krystalline Kraus:

Sisters in the Struggle
by Krystalline Kraus
June 21, 2002

Ok, so maybe pulling out my compact to check my make-up in the middle of a riot was a bit self-centred, but sweat, tear-gas and mascara were dripping into my eyes. What’s a riot girl to do!

In this age of protest, being a woman and running with the black bloc means having to pad places other than your bra. Dodging tear gas canisters and rubber bullets, some of the black bloc members you see are women. Once a rare breed of super-femmes, “grrls” are now entering into the black fold in greater numbers than ever.

On the eve of another summit spectacle with the Group of Eight (G8) meeting next week in the wilderness of Kananaskis, Alberta, different social justice groups are preparing to do battle against the eight most powerful — at least in name — leaders of the Western world. And women will be on the front lines.

You Throw Like a Girl

“Blocking up” to become the black bloc is a great equalizer. With everyone looking the same — everyone’s hair tucked away, our faces obscured by masks, I’m nothing less and nothing more than one entity moving with the whole. Everyone is capable of the same. And the politics of “nice girls don’t throw stones” is suspended, and I’m free to act outside of the traditional:“serve tea, not Molotov cocktails.” rules.

It’s once the mask comes off, the problems begin. And it's no surprise that in public debates around violence/non-violence it’s always two men yelling their heads off at each other, while women can’t get a word in edge-wise.

Sure, women are gaining popular ground in the movement, but some topics are still taboo for us. And with machismo still ruling the streets — especially during a riot — what women have to say, often gets lost in the tear gas fog.

Super-Heroines

Two awesome role model activists to keep an eye out for are Radical Cheerleaders and the Living River.

They were both on the streets of Quebec protests last year, and will be on the streets again against the G8 in June.

Radical Cheerleaders are groups of women (although not exclusively) who rage against the government using pom-poms and rhymes, instead of sticks and stones. At demonstrations, they resist creatively against capitalism, imperialism and the existing neo-liberal order through words

The Living River (again, not exclusive to females) is another creative force on the front lines. With a pledge to protect the world’s water, through ritual singing and swaying, these pagans create a “living river” to focus energy at demonstrations into a positive form.

Great Expectations

As great as my expectations are for the up-coming G8 protests across Canada, the outcome is hard to predict.

Much has been said about September 11 and the impact of the terrorist attacks on the social justice movement — and fearing terrorists might disguise themselves as protesters — especially the black bloc — has given Calgary authorities cart-blanche to use deadly force against activists.

Either way, it looks like it’s open season on the bloc.

Ottawa Rematch

The last time anti-globalization activists took the capital was after September 11, with a daring snake-march through the streets of Ottawa, November 17, 2001.

There, with hell breaking loose — facing a police force anxious to show off their live armaments, and unleash their attack dogs into the crowd — the women of direct action, including the Living River, created an enchanted circle of solidarity around the black bloc to protect them from police targeting.

The kind of solidarity shown by such groups as is crucial among groups if the movement is to continue.

What demonstrators faced in Ottawa, they’ll likely face again — whether in Kananaskis or Ottawa, either way there’ll be guns, dogs and tazers (used recently at an anti-G7 demonstration in Halifax, Nova Scotia) so we’d better be prepared.

As we stand together to take apart the current system we all oppose, we must stand united to create an alternative to that system.

And within those alternatives, remember that machismo can never replace solidarity, dignity or respect, and ushering in alternatives is as essential as tearing the master’s house down.

In the upcoming days, come what may in Kananaskis, we are honoured to be your sisters and to fight at your side.
Share
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • SlashDot
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • Fark
  • Del.icio.us
  • Blogmarks
  • Yahoo Buzz
Sisters in the Struggle | 6 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
comment by tootired
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 22 2002 @ 08:21 PM CDT
not a bad article but im a bit disappointed that it is written as if girls (the words men and women always sound too status quo to me, boy and girl till we die!) can only do that *enchanted, moral raising, creative stuff. girls can do all the stuff the boys can do too.
comment by AnonymousCarrot
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 22 2002 @ 02:34 PM CDT
Give \'em hell girls!
comment by Mick
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 22 2002 @ 11:50 AM CDT
Except that opening line was written as a personal anecdote by a woman invovled in militant activism. Sure, wearing makeup isn\'t the smartest thing to do when dealing with chemical weapons, but to say \"women can\'t wear makeup\" or \"women who wear makup aren\'t radical\" is pretty offensive too.
comment by putative terrorist
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 22 2002 @ 08:44 AM CDT
personaly, i think articles like this are unnecessary, and even a bit offensive--the opening line assumes that womyn, grrls, are concerned with make-up, the way they look, giving credit to gender stereotypes. fuck it, we are all people, and all deserve the same--solidarity.

pe(A)ce
comment by Kate
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 23 2002 @ 08:39 PM CDT
I like this article a lot - I just wish some of the points were further expanded upon. Women need to listen to some of the more \"extreme\" anarchist ideas some more. I find asking for reform from men (anarchist or not) more and more ineffective every day. While I can try and educate them, taking direct action over your life is one of the only ways to show men how its done and what you need/want/deserve. Participating in protests and organizing without asking for permission from the boys is one of the best ways to do that.
I would also like to note that as many women are gearing up for protests, that is a feild often dominated by men. Women have often played crucial roles in organizing in local struggles, which often get so much less \"cred.\" Community Organizing and support is where it\'s at and we need to be given respect and support for our effots there, as well as protests.
Other fun non-traditional girl activities: political tagging, talking to the media, building websites, creating and distributing your own literature, local black block teams, literature, etc etc. Try organizing with some other women and see what happens!
~ Kate*
comment by Necrotic State
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 25 2002 @ 03:33 PM CDT
I was watching an interview with an muslim defender of Burkas one time and he said something that I thought was interesting, that I see somewhat paralleled here: he said that by covering the women with the burka, men in his society were then able to deal with them as humans and not as sex-objects. Of course, the logic of it is completely flawed because it presumes that it is (as it usually comes down to in patriarchal society) women who have to change to accomodate men, rather than men who have to confront their objectifiying and sexist behaviors (and of course, the burka is just one of many oppressions those women face).

But, it is interesting to see a similar point raised here with regards to the Bloc. When women are in the Bloc they are anonymous, that is, elevated to the status of men by minimizing the ways that men\'s sexist tendencies can manifest. Of course, the two are different in many ways, particularly in purpose: the Bloc attire did not originate to control women (or, as the muslim burka defender put it, equalize them) - it\'s a side effect. But, as a supporter of the Bloc, I do see some interesting parallels. As always, though, it\'s up to men to get over their shit, so while the Bloc attire may inadvertantly solve this problem, there is a hell of a lot more shit that men need to deal with (some of which is pointed out in the article). Plus, usually when I\'m in a Bloc I can tell who the women and men are anyhow - and usually I can tell who most everyone is if I\'ve met them before. Sometimes I think the anonymity angle is played up a bit more than it ought to. I\'m sure it has an effect in large numbers, observed from outside. But that anonymimity very often vanishes within it, in my experience. Plus, there are lots of things that can betray someone as male or female. The voice is a clear one that is directly related to speaking out and being heard. But anyhow, more women in the Bloc would be great.

I have to say, though, I did have to stifle a laugh (well, honestly, I didn\'t stifle it) when I read about the Living Rivers thing. Radical Cheer can have some great effects at events, but I am more than skeptical about the benefits of directing positive energy. And, even if it did work, what if they started acting like peace police, directing non-violent energy so that protests don\'t get out of control (and just what is \"positive energy\"?)? It\'s really a laughable idea, but whatever floats their boat, I guess.